A combination of low doses of 17β-estradiol and norethisterone acetate prevents bone loss and normalizes bone turnover in postmenopausal women

被引:52
作者
Delmas, PD
Confavreux, E
Garnero, P
Fardellone, P
de Vernejoul, MC
Cormier, C
Arce, JC
机构
[1] Hop Edouard Herriot, INSERM, Res Unit 403, F-69437 Lyon 03, France
[2] Hop Nord Amiens, Serv Rheumatol, Amiens, France
[3] Hop Lariboisiere, F-75475 Paris, France
[4] Hop Cochin, Serv Rhumatol, F-75674 Paris, France
[5] Novo Nordisk AS, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark
关键词
17; beta-estradiol; biochemical bone markers; bone mineral density; norethisterone acetate; postmenopausal osteoporosis;
D O I
10.1007/PL00004180
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The effects of 17 beta-estradiog (E-2) 1 mg combined with low doses of norethisterone acetate (NETA) on postmenopausal bone loss and turnover were investigated in a 2-year, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 135 postmenopausal women with a lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) T-score between -2 and +2 were randomized to daily treatment with an oral tablet of either placebo, E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.25 mg, or E-2 1 mg/ NETA 0.5 mg. Significant (p<0.001) increases in BMD at the lumbar spine (L1-4) were observed with E-2 1 mg/ NETA 0.25 mg (5.2%) and E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg (5.4%) compared with placebo (-0.9%). The total hip BMD increased significantly in the E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.25 mg (3.1%) and E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg groups (3.3%) compared with placebo. At the femoral trochanter, the increase in BMD in the E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg group (6.3%) was significantly different from the placebo group (0.8%), while that in the E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.25 mg group (3.3%) was not. No statistical differences were found between the active groups and placebo for the change in BMD at the femoral neck. Significant increases in BMD at the distal radius and total body were found for both E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.25 mg (0.9% and 2.5%, respectively) and E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg (2.1% and 3.0%, respectively) compared with placebo (- 0.7% and 0.4%, respectively). At the end of the treatment, urinary pyridinoline type I collagen C-telopeptide had decreased by 65% and 60% in the E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.25 mg and E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg groups, respectively, while the mean serum concentrations of osteocalcin had decreased by 39% and 34%, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase by 32% and 29%, and C-terminal propeptide of type I collagen by 21% and 19% had decreased by 34-39%, 29-32%, and 19-21% in the E-2 1 mg/NETA 0.25 mg and E-2 1 mg/ NETA 0.25 mg groups, respectively. In conclusion, combinations of E-2 1 mg and NETA 0.25 or 0.5 mg prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women at the lumbar spine, hip, distal radius and total body, and normalize bone turnover.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 187
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Baerug U, 1998, Climacteric, V1, P219
[2]   COMPLIANCE TO HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN MENOPAUSAL WOMEN CONTROLLED IN A 3RD LEVEL ACADEMIC CENTER [J].
CANO, A .
MATURITAS, 1994, 20 (2-3) :91-99
[3]   ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY AND FRACTURES IN OLDER WOMEN [J].
CAULEY, JA ;
SEELEY, DG ;
ENSRUD, K ;
ETTINGER, B ;
BLACK, D ;
CUMMINGS, SR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 122 (01) :9-16
[4]   17-BETA-ESTRADIOL AND CONTINUOUS NORETHISTERONE - A UNIQUE TREATMENT FOR ESTABLISHED OSTEOPOROSIS IN ELDERLY WOMEN [J].
CHRISTIANSEN, C ;
RIIS, BJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1990, 71 (04) :836-841
[5]  
CHRISTIANSEN C, 1985, LANCET, V2, P800
[6]  
CHRISTIANSEN C, 1981, LANCET, V1, P459
[7]   POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF SURVIVAL AFTER OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES [J].
COOPER, C ;
ATKINSON, EJ ;
JACOBSEN, SJ ;
OFALLON, WM ;
MELTON, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 137 (09) :1001-1005
[8]  
Delmas P. D., 1996, P1075
[9]   Effects on bone mass after eight years of hormonal replacement therapy [J].
Eiken, P ;
Nielsen, SP ;
Kolthoff, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (06) :702-707
[10]   LOW-DOSAGE MICRONIZED 17-BETA-ESTRADIOL PREVENTS RONE LOSS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN [J].
ETTINGER, B ;
GENANT, HK ;
STEIGER, P ;
MADVIG, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (02) :479-488