Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig

被引:90
作者
Mitchell, A [1 ]
Miller, JM [1 ]
Finger, PA [1 ]
Heller, JW [1 ]
Raphael, Y [1 ]
Altschuler, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,KRESGE HEARING RES INST,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
关键词
deafness; cochlear implant; auditory nerve; electrical stimulation; guinea pig; spiral ganglion cell; otopathology;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-5955(96)00202-X
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This study was undertaken to examine the effects of chronic high-rate stimulation on the eighth nerve and cochlea. Fifty-four male pigmented guinea pigs were deafened and implanted with single ball electrodes in scala tympani. Four groups of animals received chronic electrical stimulation at a level of 5 mu Col/cm(2)/ph for 1000 h as follows: Group A: 1000 Hz, 100 mu s/ph duration, 100 mu A peak; Group B: 250 Hz, 100 mu s/ph duration, 100 mu A peak; Group C: 2750 Hz, 36 mu s/ph duration, 250 mu A peak; Group D: 250 Hz, 400 mu s/ph duration, 25 mu A peak. Also, two control groups received 20 min stimulation during weekly electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) measurement (Group E) and about 5 s stimulation (Group Fl during a brief eABR 3 day postimplantation and at perfusion. On Day 50, animals were perfused, midmodiolar sections cut and a quantitative assessment of spiral ganglion cells (SGC) performed. All stimulated subjects showed a similar decrease in eABR thresholds and dynamic range over time. No stimulation conditions induced pathology. All stimulation conditions enhanced survival of SGCs compared to unimplanted ears and implanted non-stimulated ears (Group F). There were no statistically significant differences in SGC survival between any stimulated groups, including Group E stimulated once a week. In conclusion, high-rate stimulation, under the conditions of this study, provides no additional risks and the same benefits to SGC survival as low-rate stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 43
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   HISTOLOGIC AND PHYSIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF ELECTRICALLY STIMULATED PERIPHERAL-NERVE - CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE SELECTION OF PARAMETERS [J].
AGNEW, WF ;
MCCREERY, DB ;
YUEN, TGH ;
BULLARA, LA .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1989, 17 (01) :39-60
[2]   MK-801 PROTECTS AGAINST NEURONAL INJURY INDUCED BY ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
AGNEW, WF ;
MCCREERY, DB ;
YUEN, TGH ;
BULLARA, LA .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 52 (01) :45-53
[3]  
AGNEW WF, 1990, FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES
[4]  
COLUMBO J, 1987, HEARING RES, V31, P287
[5]   ACUTE MORPHOLOGICAL-CHANGES IN GUINEA-PIG COCHLEA FOLLOWING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION - A PRELIMINARY SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE STUDY [J].
DUCKERT, LG ;
MILLER, JM .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1982, 91 (01) :33-40
[6]  
FINLEY CC, 1990, COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, P35
[7]   MULTIVARIATE PREDICTORS OF AUDIOLOGICAL SUCCESS WITH MULTICHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANTS [J].
GANTZ, BJ ;
WOODWORTH, GG ;
KNUTSON, JF ;
ABBAS, PJ ;
TYLER, RS .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1993, 102 (12) :909-916
[8]   ESTIMATION OF SURVIVING SPIRAL GANGLION-CELLS IN THE DEAF RAT USING THE ELECTRICALLY EVOKED AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE [J].
HALL, RD .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1990, 45 (1-2) :123-136
[9]   PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION IN THE DEAFENED GUINEA-PIG COCHLEA [J].
HARTSHORN, DO ;
MILLER, JM ;
ALTSCHULER, RA .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1991, 104 (03) :311-319
[10]  
Javel E., 1987, AUDITORY PROCESSING, P237