Reducing pain during propofol injection: The role of the solvent

被引:147
作者
Doenicke, AW
Roizen, MF
Rau, J
Kellermann, W
Babl, J
机构
[1] UNIV CHICAGO,DEPT ANESTHESIA & CRIT CARE,CHICAGO,IL 60637
[2] UNIV MUNICH,INST ANESTHESIOL,MUNICH,GERMANY
[3] UNIV HALLE WITTENBERG,DEPT ANESTHESIA & CRIT CARE,HALLE,GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199603000-00007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
We hypothesized that the concentration of propofol in the aqueous phase may be the most important variable responsible for the pain experienced during injection of the drug. The concentration of propofol in the aqueous phase (18.57 mu g/mL) can be decreased by increasing the fat concentration of the solvent. To test this hypothesis, 36 patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups, each receiving a different formulation of propofol. Group A received 20 mL of propofol alone in a commercial preparation (Diprivan(R) with 10 mL of saline); Group B, 20 mt of propofol to which 5 mt of long-chain triglyceride (LCT) fat emulsion and 5 mt of saline had been added; and Group C, 20 mt of propofol and 10 mt of LCT fat emulsion. The propofol emulsion was injected over 30-60 s into a dorsal vein of the hand. Patients reported pain during injection as none, mild, moderate, or severe (almost intolerable). In Group A, 8 of 12 patients reported moderate or severe pain upon injection, whereas in Group C only mild pain was reported by 6 of 12 patients. Our results suggest that a smaller concentration of propofol in the aqueous phase of the emulsion reduces pain on injection. With the addition of more lipid (10 mt), a higher percentage of propofol is absorbed by the fat particles. If solvents that permit a smaller concentration of drug in the aqueous phase of oil-in-water emulsions were used for propofol and other drugs that cause pain on injection, pain would be reduced and patient satisfaction may be increased.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 474
页数:3
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
BABL J, 1995, EUR HOSP PHARM, V1, P15
[2]
EFFECT OF PRIOR ADMINISTRATION OF COLD SALINE ON PAIN DURING PROPOFOL INJECTION - A COMPARISON WITH COLD PROPOFOL AND PROPOFOL WITH LIGNOCAINE [J].
BARKER, P ;
LANGTON, JA ;
MURPHY, P ;
ROWBOTHAM, DJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (12) :1069-1070
[3]
DOENICKE A, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P933
[4]
DOENICKE A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V75, P431
[5]
THE EFFECT OF THE ANESTHETISTS ATTIRE ON PATIENT ATTITUDES - THE INFLUENCE OF DRESS ON PATIENT PERCEPTION OF THE ANESTHETISTS PRESTIGE [J].
HENNESSY, N ;
HARRISON, DA ;
AITKENHEAD, AR .
ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (03) :219-222
[6]
PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL - METHODS OF ALLEVIATION [J].
JOHNSON, RA ;
HARPER, NJN ;
CHADWICK, S ;
VOHRA, A .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (06) :439-442
[7]
LIDOCAINE FOR THE PREVENTION OF PAIN DUE TO INJECTION OF PROPOFOL [J].
KING, SY ;
DAVIS, FM ;
WELLS, JE ;
MURCHISON, DJ ;
PRYOR, PJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 74 (02) :246-249
[8]
PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL - EFFECTS OF CONCENTRATION AND DILUENT [J].
KLEMENT, W ;
ARNDT, JO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (03) :281-284
[9]
LEE TW, 1994, ANAESTHESIA, V49, P817
[10]
Lichtor J. L., 1995, Anesthesia and Analgesia, V80, pS281