Diminishing significance of HLA matching in kidney transplantation

被引:120
作者
Su, XM
Zenios, SA
Chakkera, H
Milford, EL
Chertow, GM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Renal, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
bootstrapping; graft survival; HLA matching; kidney transplantation; likelihood ratios;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00535.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
To determine trends in the significance of HLA matching and other risk factors in kidney transplantation, we analyzed data on graft survival in a consecutive sample of 33 443 transplant recipients who received deceased donor kidneys from December 1994 to December 1998 with a mean follow-up time of 2.2 years. HLA matching and other risk factors (peak panel reactive antibody, donor age, sex and cause of death, cold ischemia time, donor and recipient body size) were examined. Mean likelihood ratios of models, fit with and without each variable of interest, were calculated by generating bootstrapped samples from each single year cohort. Pooled censored and uncensored graft survival rates were 90.6% and 89.9% at 1 year, 85.8% and 84.5% at 2 years, and 80.7% and 78.6% at 3 years. HLA matching declined in significance while other factors retained similar levels of statistical significance over the four yearly cohorts. With evolving clinical practice, including the provision of safer and more potent immunosuppressive therapy, the significance of HLA matching has diminished. Non-immunologic factors continue to impede more marked improvements in long-term graft survival. Recognizing these trends, organ allocation algorithms may need to be revised.
引用
收藏
页码:1501 / 1508
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Evolution of immunosuppression and continued importance of acute rejection in renal transplantation [J].
Chan, L ;
Gaston, R ;
Hariharan, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2001, 38 (06) :S2-S9
[2]   Antigen-independent determinants of cadaveric kidney transplant failure [J].
Chertow, GM ;
Milford, EL ;
Mackenzie, HS ;
Brenner, BM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (21) :1732-1736
[3]  
Collins A J, 1998, Am J Kidney Dis, V32, pS133, DOI 10.1016/S0272-6386(98)70176-3
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]  
Efron B., 1994, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[6]   Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation - Clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse? [J].
Epstein, AM ;
Ayanian, JZ ;
Keogh, JH ;
Noonan, SJ ;
Armistead, N ;
Cleary, PD ;
Weissman, JS ;
David-Kasdan, JA ;
Carlson, D ;
Fuller, J ;
Marsh, D ;
Conti, RM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (21) :1537-U8
[7]  
Feldman HI, 1996, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V7, P151
[8]   RACIAL EQUITY IN RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION - THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF HLA BASED ALLOCATION [J].
GASTON, RS ;
AYRES, I ;
DOOLEY, LG ;
DIETHELM, AG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (11) :1352-1356
[9]  
Halloran PF, 1999, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V10, P167
[10]   Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. [J].
Hariharan, S ;
Johnson, CP ;
Bresnahan, BA ;
Taranto, SE ;
McIntosh, MJ ;
Stablein, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (09) :605-612