Improving group decision making: A fuzzy GSS approach

被引:24
作者
Kwok, RCW [1 ]
Ma, J
Zhou, DN
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Sch Management, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Informat Syst, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Eastern Washington Univ, Dept Accounting & Informat Syst, Spokane, WA 99202 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS | 2002年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
fuzzy sets; group support system (GSS); multicriteria decision making (MCDM);
D O I
10.1109/TSMCC.2002.1009142
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Group decision-making methods have been developed extensively, but their adaptation for use in organizations has been problematic. According to Arrow's Impossibility theorem, one conceivable reason is that a group decision outcome could never satisfy all decision makers' individual preferences. In order to accommodate individual decision maker's preferences in a group decision-making task, this correspondence presents a fuzzy multiperson multicriteria decision making (MMCDM) model and a structured group decision-making process. The fuzzy MMCDM model includes fuzzy individual preference generation and group preference aggregation. The structured decision-making process keeps the group interaction on track, so that the fuzzy MMDCM model can be effectively applied to the group decision-making task. Based on the proposed model and the decision-making process, a fuzzy group support system (GSS) has been developed and applied to a group assessment task. An empirical study was conducted and the experiment results showed that use of the fuzzy GSS enhanced individual understanding, consensus, and satisfaction of the group decision outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   COMPUTER-MEDIATED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING - AN EMPIRICAL-EVALUATION [J].
ALAVI, M .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1994, 18 (02) :159-174
[2]   RATING AND RANKING OF MULTIPLE-ASPECT ALTERNATIVES USING FUZZY SETS [J].
BAAS, SM ;
KWAKERNAAK, H .
AUTOMATICA, 1977, 13 (01) :47-58
[3]  
BANERJEE A, 1994, SOC CHOICE WELFARE, V11, P121
[4]  
Bellman R. E., 1971, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
[5]   THE EFFECTS OF GROUP, TASK, CONTEXT, AND TECHNOLOGY VARIABLES ON THE USEFULNESS OF GROUP SUPPORT SYSTEMS - A METAANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES [J].
BENBASAT, I ;
LIM, LH .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1993, 24 (04) :430-462
[6]   A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J].
Bordogna, G ;
Fedrizzi, M ;
Pasi, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01) :126-132
[7]   A fuzzy parametrical forward- and backward-chained two-dimensional attribute decision model [J].
Crowe, TJ ;
Nuno, JP .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (02) :186-194
[8]  
Daly B. L., 1993, ACCOUNTING MANAGEMEN, V3, P1, DOI [10.1016/0959-8022(93)90006-R, DOI 10.1016/0959-8022(93)90006-R]
[9]   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO SUPPORT ELECTRONIC MEETINGS [J].
DENNIS, AR ;
GEORGE, JF ;
JESSUP, LM ;
NUNAMAKER, JF ;
VOGEL, DR .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1988, 12 (04) :591-624
[10]   A FOUNDATION FOR THE STUDY OF GROUP DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS [J].
DESANCTIS, G ;
GALLUPE, RB .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1987, 33 (05) :589-609