Intraoperative pedography: A validated method for static intraoperative biomechanical assessment

被引:20
作者
Richter, Martinus [1 ]
Frink, Michael [1 ]
Zech, Stefan [1 ]
Vanin, Nicolas [1 ]
Geerling, Jens [1 ]
Droste, Patrizia [1 ]
Krettek, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Unfallchirurg Klin, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
biomechanical assessment; intraoperative pedography; pedography; validation;
D O I
10.1177/107110070602701014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A new device was developed to perform intraoperative static pedography. The purpose of this study was to validate the introduced method by a comparison with the standard method for dynamic and static pedography. Methods: A device known as Kraftsimulator Intraoperative Pedographie(R) (KIOP(R)) was developed for intraoperative placement of standardized forces to the sole of the foot. Pedographic measurements were done with a custom-made mat that was inserted into the KIOP(R) (Pliance(R), Novel Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA). Validation was done in two steps: (1) comparison of standard dynamic pedography walking on a platform, standard static pedography in standing on a platform, and pedography with KIOP(R) in supine position in 30 healthy volunteers, and (2) comparison of static pedography in standing position, pedography with KIOP(R) supine awake, and pedography with KIOP(R) supine with 30 patients under anesthesia. Individuals who had operative procedures at the knee or distal to the knee were excluded. The different measurements were compared (one-way ANOVA, t-test; significance level 0.05). Results: No significant differences were found among all measurements for the hindfoot compared to midfoot-forefoot force distribution. For the medial compared to lateral force distribution and the 10-region-mapping, significant differences were found when comparing all measurements (steps 1 and 2) and when comparing the measurements of step I only. No differences were found for these distributions when comparing the measurements of step 2 alone or when comparing the measurements of step 1 and 2 without the platform measurements of step 1 (dynamic walking pedography and static standing pedography). No significant differences in the force distributions were found in step 2 when comparing subjects without anesthesia, with general anesthesia, and with spinal anesthesia. Conclusions: The KIOP device allows a valid static intraoperative pedography measurement. No statistically significant force distribution differences were found between standing subjects and anesthetized subjects in the supine position.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 842
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Adelaar R S, 1981, Foot Ankle, V2, P126
[2]
THE ASSESSMENT OF DYNAMIC FOOT-TO-GROUND CONTACT FORCES AND PLANTAR PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION - A REVIEW OF THE EVOLUTION OF CURRENT TECHNIQUES AND CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS [J].
ALEXANDER, IJ ;
CHAO, EYS ;
JOHNSON, KA .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1990, 11 (03) :152-167
[3]
[Anonymous], 1981, Human walking
[4]
GAIT PATTERN-ANALYSIS AFTER ANKLE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION (MODIFIED EVANS PROCEDURE) [J].
BECKER, HP ;
ROSENBAUM, D ;
ZEITHAMMEL, G ;
GERNGROSS, H ;
CLAES, L .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (09) :477-482
[5]
Cavanagh P R, 1993, Clin Podiatr Med Surg, V10, P471
[6]
Elevated plantar pressure and ulceration in diabetic patients after panmetatarsal head resection: Two case reports [J].
Cavanagh, PR ;
Ulbrecht, JS ;
Caputo, GM .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 20 (08) :521-526
[7]
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION UNDER SYMPTOM-FREE FEET DURING BAREFOOT STANDING [J].
CAVANAGH, PR ;
RODGERS, MM ;
IIBOSHI, A .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1987, 7 (05) :262-276
[8]
Surgical management of severe deformity resulting from posterior tibial tendon dysfunction [J].
Coetzee, JC ;
Hansen, ST .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 22 (12) :944-949
[9]
DURANTI R, 1985, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V64, P295
[10]
Isolated subtalar arthrodesis [J].
Easley, ME ;
Trnka, HJ ;
Schon, LC ;
Myerson, MS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (05) :613-624