Reexamining the Relationship of Breast Cancer Hospital and Surgical Volume to Mortality An Instrumental Variable Analysis

被引:24
作者
Pezzin, Liliana E. [1 ,2 ]
Laud, Purushottam [2 ,3 ]
Yen, Tina W. F. [2 ,4 ]
Neuner, Joan [1 ,2 ]
Nattinger, Ann B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Ctr Patient Care & Outcomes Res, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Div Biostat, Inst Hlth & Soc, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
hospital volume; breast cancer outcomes; instrumental variables; mortality; OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP; 5-YEAR SURVIVAL; IMPACT; WOMEN; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0000000000000439
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To reexamine the relationship of hospital and surgical volume to all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, taking into account the potential selection bias in patients treated at high-volume centers or by high-volume surgeons.Data Sources:Elderly (65+) women with early-stage, incident breast cancer surgery in 2003.Study Design:A population-based, prospective survey study.Methods:Two-stage, instrumental variable regression models.Principal Findings:Women treated in high-volume hospitals were significantly less likely to die of any cause by 5 years after surgery, even after adjustments for self-selection and a number of other factors. The relationship was larger and more significant for breast cancer-specific mortality. Although the general pattern of better mortality outcomes held for moderately sized hospitals, the relationships were not statistically significant. In contrast, there was no relationship of surgeon volume with all-cause or breast cancer-specific mortality.Conclusions:Hospital volume, but not surgeon volume, is associated with better survival among women with breast cancer. The magnitude of the potential improvement was substantial and comparable with the benefit conferred by many systemic therapies. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for patient self-selection in volume-outcome analyses, and provide support for policy initiatives aimed at regionalizing breast cancer care in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1039
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NAT DEATH IND
[3]   Survival after breast cancer treatment: the impact of provider volume [J].
Bailie, Karen ;
Dobie, Iain ;
Kirk, Stephen ;
Donnelly, Michael .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 13 (05) :749-757
[4]   Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Birkmeyer, CM .
SURGERY, 2001, 130 (03) :415-422
[5]   Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer [J].
Gilligan, Mary Ann ;
Neuner, Joan ;
Zhang, Xu ;
Sparapani, Rodney ;
Laud, Purushottam W. ;
Nattinger, Ann B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 97 (03) :539-544
[6]  
Gooiker G A, 2010, Eur J Surg Oncol, V36 Suppl 1, pS27, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.024
[7]   High hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for breast cancer surgery: Analysis of 233,247 patients [J].
Guller, U ;
Safford, S ;
Pietrobon, R ;
Heberer, M ;
Oertli, D ;
Jain, NB .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 29 (08) :994-1000
[8]   Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature [J].
Halm, EA ;
Lee, C ;
Chassin, MR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (06) :511-520
[9]   Is there a relationship between case volume and survival in breast cancer? [J].
Harcourt, KF ;
Hicks, KL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 185 (05) :407-410
[10]   Investigating the correlation between hospital of primary treatment and the survival of women with breast cancer [J].
Hébert-Croteau, N ;
Brisson, J ;
Lemaire, J ;
Latreille, J ;
Pineault, R .
CANCER, 2005, 104 (07) :1343-1348