The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape

被引:792
作者
Hanski, I [1 ]
Ovaskainen, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Ecol & Systemat, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1038/35008063
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ecologists and conservation biologists have used many measures of landscape structure(1-5) to predict the population dynamic consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation(6-8), but these measures are not well justified by population dynamic theory. Here we introduce a new measure for highly fragmented landscapes, termed the metapopulation capacity, which is rigorously derived from metapopulation theory and can easily be applied to real networks of habitat fragments with known areas and connectivities. Technically, metapopulation capacity is the leading eigenvalue of an appropriate 'landscape' matrix. A species is predicted to persist in a landscape if the metapopulation capacity of that landscape is greater than a threshold value determined by the properties of the species. Therefore, metapopulation capacity can conveniently be used to rank different landscapes in terms of their capacity to support viable metapopulations. We present an empirical example on multiple networks occupied by an endangered species of butterfly. Using this theory, we may also calculate how the metapopulation capacity is changed by removing habitat fragments from or adding new ones into specific spatial locations, or by changing their areas. The metapopulation capacity should rnd many applications in metapopulation ecology, landscape ecology and conservation biology.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 758
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   PERSISTENCE IN PATCHY IRREGULAR LANDSCAPES [J].
ADLER, FR ;
NUERNBERGER, B .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 45 (01) :41-75
[2]  
ANDERSON R M, 1991
[3]   SPATIALLY INDUCED BIFURCATIONS IN SINGLE-SPECIES POPULATION-DYNAMICS [J].
BASCOMPTE, J ;
SOLE, RV .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (02) :256-264
[5]   Sensitivity of selection procedures for priority conservation areas to survey extent, survey intensity and taxonomic knowledge [J].
Freitag, S ;
Van Jaarsveld, AS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 265 (1405) :1475-1482
[6]  
GARDNER RH, 1993, HUMANS AS COMPONENTS OF ECOSYSTEMS, P208
[7]  
Grenfell B. T., 1995, ECOLOGY INFECT DIS N
[8]   The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization [J].
Gustafson, EJ ;
Gardner, RH .
ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (01) :94-107
[9]   Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? [J].
Gustafson, EJ .
ECOSYSTEMS, 1998, 1 (02) :143-156
[10]   A PRACTICAL MODEL OF METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS [J].
HANSKI, I .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (01) :151-162