Giant cell arteritis: Validity and reliability of various diagnostic criteria

PURPOSE: To ascertain the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of: various signs and symptoms of and diagnostic tests for early diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. METHODS: From 1973 to 1994, we studied 363 patients who had temporal artery biopsy for suspected giant cell arteritis. All patients underwent detailed clinical evaluation and had erythrocyte sedimentation rates determined; since 1985, 223 patients had their C-reactive protein values estimated. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels were also estimated in 749 and 138 control subjects, respectively. Signs and symptoms of giant cell arteritis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein levels among patients with positive and negative biopsies were compared. RESULTS: Of the 363 patients, temporal artery biopsy was positive in 106 and negative in 257. The odds of a positive biopsy were 9.0 times greater with jaw claudication (P < .0001), 3.4 times greater with neck pain (P = .0085), 2.0 times greater with an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 47 to 107 mm/hour (P = .0454), 3.2 times greater with C-reactive protein above 2.45 mg/dl (P = .0208), and 2.0 times greater for age 75 years or more (P = .0105). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical criteria most strongly suggestive of giant cell arteritis include jaw claudication, C-reactive protein above 2.45 mg/dl, neck pain, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 47 mm/hour or more, in that order. C-reactive protein was more sensitive (100%) than erythrocyte sedimentation rate (92%) for detection of giant cell arteritis; erythrocyte sedimentation rate combined with C-reactive protein gave the best specificity (97%).