Yearly Prostate Specific Antigen and Digital Rectal Examination Fluctuations in a Screened Population

被引:18
作者
Ankerst, Donna Pauler [1 ,2 ]
Miyamoto, Ryan [1 ]
Nair, Prakash Vijay [2 ]
Pollock, Brad H. [2 ]
Thompson, Ian M. [1 ]
Parekh, Dipen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Urol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
prostate-specific antigen; digital rectal examination; time factors; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; CANCER; SERUM; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Prostate biopsy is often recommended based on increases in prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. We investigated the stability of a single positive test during the next 3 consecutive years. Materials and Methods: A total of 2,578 participants in a San Antonio screening cohort with 2 or more consecutive annual prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination tests were identified. Occurrences of an increased prostate specific antigen (2.5 ng/ml or greater) followed by 1 or more non-increased prostate specific antigen results were compared with similar fluctuations of digital rectal examination from abnormal to normal. Results: In 2,272 men who did not have a biopsy during the study, in 23.3% of 744 incidences of an increased prostate specific antigen with 1 year of followup, the next prostate specific antigen was not increased. In 19.5% of 462 incidences of an increased prostate specific antigen with 2 years of followup, the next 2 consecutive prostate specific antigen levels were not increased. Finally, in 17.5% of 285 incidences of an increased prostate specific antigen with 3 years of followup, the next 3 consecutive prostate specific antigens were not increased. Rates were similar but lower in 221 men with 1 or more negative biopsies during the study and in 85 men in whom prostate cancer eventually developed during the study. In contrast, approximately 70% of abnormal digital rectal examinations were normal the following year even in patients with prostate cancer, and in the majority of incidences remained normal the next 2 to 3 consecutive years. Conclusions: Occurrences of reversed prostate specific antigen cut point or abnormal digital rectal examination based decisions to biopsy 1 or more years after the initial test are not uncommon, suggesting repetition of these tests.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2075
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: Findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial [J].
Andriole, GL ;
Levin, DL ;
Crawford, ED ;
Gelmann, ER ;
Pinsky, PF ;
Chia, D ;
Kramer, BS ;
Reding, D ;
Church, TR ;
Grubb, RL ;
Izmirlian, G ;
Ragard, LR ;
Clapp, JD ;
Prorok, PC ;
Gohagan, JK .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (06) :433-438
[2]   COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL OF 6,630 MEN [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
RICHIE, JP ;
AHMANN, FR ;
HUDSON, MA ;
SCARDINO, PT ;
FLANIGAN, RC ;
DEKERNION, JB ;
RATLIFF, TL ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
DALKIN, BL ;
WATERS, WB ;
MACFARLANE, MT ;
SOUTHWICK, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1283-1290
[3]   Controversies regarding screening for prostate cancer [J].
Crawford, E. David ;
Thompson, Ian M. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 100 :5-7
[4]   Variation of serum prostate-specific antigen levels - An evaluation of year-to-year fluctuations [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Riedel, E ;
Scardino, PT ;
Shike, M ;
Fleisher, M ;
Schatzkin, A ;
Lanza, E ;
Latkany, L ;
Begg, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (20) :2695-2700
[5]   RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR IMPALPABLE PROSTATE-CANCER - THE JOHNS-HOPKINS EXPERIENCE WITH TUMORS FOUND ON TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION (STAGES T1A AND T1B) AND ON NEEDLE-BIOPSY (STAGE T1C) [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1721-1729
[6]   The Interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer [J].
Gosselaar, C. ;
Kranse, R. ;
Roobol, M. J. ;
Roemeling, S. ;
Schroder, F. H. .
PROSTATE, 2008, 68 (09) :985-993
[7]  
GOSSELAAR C, 2008, EUR UROL
[8]   The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam [J].
Gosselaar, Claartje ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Roemeling, Stijn ;
Schroder, Fritz H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (03) :581-588
[9]   Cancer statistics, 2008 [J].
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Siegel, Rebecca ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Hao, Yongping ;
Xu, Jiaquan ;
Murray, Taylor ;
Thun, Michael J. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2008, 58 (02) :71-96
[10]   Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer: Rationale, risks, and results [J].
Klotz, Laurence .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2007, 25 (06) :505-509