Sensitivity and specificity of pooled faecal culture and serology as flock-screening tests for detection of ovine paratuberculosis in Australia

被引:39
作者
Sergeant, ESG
Whittington, RJ
More, SJ
机构
[1] NSW Agr, Elizabeth Macarthur Agr Inst, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Vet Sci, Kenmore, Qld 4069, Australia
[3] NSW Agr, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
关键词
sheep; paratuberculosis; Johne's disease; diagnostic tests; Bayesian methods; sensitivity; specificity; pooled faecal culture; flock tests;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00261-6
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The flock-level sensitivity of pooled faecal culture and serological testing using AGID for the detection of ovine Johne's disease-infected flocks were estimated using non-gold-standard methods. The two tests were compared in an extensive field trial in 296 flocks in New South Wales during 1998. In each flock, a sample of sheep was selected and tested for ovine Johne's disease using both the AGID and pooled faecal culture. The flock-specificity of pooled faecal culture also was estimated from results of surveillance and market-assurance testing in New South Wales. The overall flock-sensitivity of pooled faecal culture was 92% (95% CI: 82.4 and 97.4%) compared to 61% (50.5 and 70.9%) for serology (assuming that both tests were 100% specific). In low-prevalence flocks (estimated prevalence <2%), the flock-sensitivities of pooled faecal culture and serology were 82% (57 and 96%) and 33% (19 and 49%), respectively, compared to 96% (85 and 99.5%) and 85% (72 and 93%), respectively, in higher-prevalence flocks (estimated prevalence greater than or equal to2%). A Bayesian approach incorporating prior knowledge on flock-specificity of pooled culture produced similar estimates and probability intervals. These estimates assume conditional independence of the two tests, and therefore might have over-estimated the true flock-sensitivities of the tests if the flock-sensitivities of pooled faecal culture and serology were correlated. The estimated minimum flock-specificity of pooled culture when used for surveillance and assurance testing was 99.1% (96.9 and 99.9%). Surveillance and assurance programs in Australia are designed to provide a flock-sensitivity of 95% for an assumed prevalence of 2%. Pooled faecal culture is performing at close to this level-whereas the flock-sensitivity of serology appears to be lower than expected, particularly in lower prevalence flocks. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 211
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Progress in national control and assurance programs for ovine Johne's disease in Australia [J].
Allworth, MB ;
Kennedy, DJ .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 77 (3-4) :415-422
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, NATL JOHNES DIS PROG
[3]  
Chaitaweesub P, 1999, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON PARATUBERCULOSIS, P126
[4]   Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests [J].
Dendukuri, N ;
Joseph, L .
BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (01) :158-167
[5]   Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown [J].
Enoe, C ;
Georgiadis, MP ;
Johnson, WO .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2000, 45 (1-2) :61-81
[6]   Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases [J].
Gardner, IA ;
Stryhn, H ;
Lind, P ;
Collins, MT .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2000, 45 (1-2) :107-122
[7]   Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests [J].
Greiner, M ;
Gardner, IA .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2000, 45 (1-2) :3-22
[8]   BAYESIAN-ESTIMATION OF DISEASE PREVALENCE AND THE PARAMETERS OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS IN THE ABSENCE OF A GOLD STANDARD [J].
JOSEPH, L ;
GYORKOS, TW ;
COUPAL, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 141 (03) :263-272
[9]   EVALUATING THE HEALTH-STATUS OF HERDS BASED ON TESTS APPLIED TO INDIVIDUALS [J].
MARTIN, SW ;
SHOUKRI, M ;
THORBURN, MA .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1992, 14 (1-2) :33-43
[10]   ESTIMATING PREVALENCE FROM RESULTS OF A SCREENING-TEST [J].
ROGAN, WJ ;
GLADEN, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1978, 107 (01) :71-76