ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study

被引:144
作者
Janssen, Michael E. [1 ]
Zigler, Jack E. [1 ]
Spivak, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Delamarter, Rick B. [1 ]
Darden, Bruce V., II [1 ]
Kopjar, Branko [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Spinal Disorders, Sci Educ & Res Inst, Thornton, CO 80229 USA
关键词
ADJACENT; SEGMENTS; STRAIN; SPINE;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.N.01186
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: In patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease, total disc arthroplasty can relieve radicular pain and preserve functional motion between two vertebrae. We compared the efficacy and safety of cervical total disc arthroplasty with that of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of single-level cervical degenerative disc disease between C3-C4 and C6-C7. Methods: Two hundred and nine patients at thirteen sites were randomly treated with either total disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C (n = 103) or with ACDF (n = 106). Patients were assessed preoperatively; at six weeks and three, six, twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months postoperatively; and then annually until seven years postoperatively. Outcome measures included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), postoperative neurologic parameters, secondary surgical procedures, adverse events, neck and arm pain, and satisfaction scores. Results: At seven years, the overall follow-up rate was 92% (152 of 165). There were no significant differences in demographic factors, follow-up rate, or patient-reported outcomes between groups. Both procedures were effective in reducing neck and arm pain and improving and maintaining function and health-related quality of life. Neurologic status was improved or maintained in 88% and 89% of the patients in the ProDisc-C and ACDF groups, respectively. After seven years of follow-up, thirty secondary surgical procedures had been performed in nineteen (18%) of 106 patients in the ACDF group compared with seven secondary surgical procedures in seven (7%) of 103 patients in the ProDisc-C group (p = 0.0099). There were no significant differences in the rates of any device-related adverse events between the groups. Conclusions: Total disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C is a safe and effective surgical treatment of single-level symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. Clinical outcomes after total disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C were similar to those after ACDF. Patients treated with ProDisc-C had a lower probability of subsequent surgery, suggesting that total disc arthroplasty provides durable results and has the potential to slow the rate of adjacent-level disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1738 / 1747
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Albert T J, 1999, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V7, P368
[2]
Segmental Contribution Toward Total Cervical Range of Motion A Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Fusion [J].
Auerbach, Joshua D. ;
Anakwenze, Okechukwu A. ;
Milby, Andrew H. ;
Lonner, Baron S. ;
Balderston, Richard A. .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (25) :E1593-E1599
[3]
Cervical disc arthroplasty [J].
Bhatnagar, Rishi ;
Bergin, Patrick ;
Yu, Warren ;
O'Brien, Joseph R. .
CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2010, 21 (03) :306-309
[4]
Reoperations in Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Anterior Cervical Fusion Results Compiled From Multiple Prospective Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Trials Conducted at a Single Site [J].
Blumenthal, Scott L. ;
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. ;
Guyer, Richard D. ;
Zigler, Jack E. .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (14) :1177-1182
[5]
Boselie TF, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V9
[6]
Boyce Robert H, 2003, Instr Course Lect, V52, P489
[7]
Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Campbell, Mitchell J. ;
Anderson, Paul A. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (06) :469-474
[8]
Artificial Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Systematic Review [J].
Cepoiu-Martin, Monica ;
Faris, Peter ;
Lorenzetti, Diane ;
Prefontaine, Eliza ;
Noseworthy, Tom ;
Sutherland, Lloyd .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (25) :E1623-E1633
[9]
Five-Year Reoperation Rates, Cervical Total Disc Replacement Versus Fusion, Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Delamarter, Rick B. ;
Zigler, Jack .
SPINE, 2013, 38 (09) :711-717
[10]
Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Arthroplasty versus Arthrodesis for Single-Level Cervical Spondylosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Fallah, Aria ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Ebrahim, Shanil ;
Ibrahim, George M. ;
Mansouri, Alireza ;
Foote, Clary J. ;
Zhang, Yuqing ;
Fehlings, Michael G. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08)