Hierarchical and linear sequence processing: An electrophysiological exploration of two different grammar types

被引:41
作者
Bahlmann, Joerg [1 ]
Gunter, Thomas C. [1 ]
Friederici, Angela D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1829
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The present study investigated the processing of two types of artificial grammars by means of event-related brain potentials. Two categories of meaningless CV syllables were applied in each grammar type. The two grammars differed with regard to the type of the underlying rule. The finite-state grammar (FSG) followed the rule (AB)(n), thereby generating local transitions between As and Bs (e.g., n = 2, ABAB). The phrase structure grammar (PSG) followed the rule A(n)B(n), thereby generating center-embedded structures in which the first A and the last B embed the middle elements (e.g., n = 2, [A[AB]B]). Two sequence lengths (n = 2, n = 4) were used. Violations of the structures were introduced at different positions of the syllable sequences. Early violations were situated at the beginning of a sequence, and late violations were placed at the end of a sequence. A posteriorly distributed early negativity elicited by violations was present only in FSG. This effect was interpreted as the possible reflection of a violated local expectancy. Moreover, both grammar-type violations elicited a late positivity. This positivity varied as a function of the violation position in PSG, but not in FSG. These findings suggest that the late positivity could reflect difficulty of integration in PSG sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:1829 / 1842
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning [J].
Baldwin, KB ;
Kutas, M .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 34 (01) :74-86
[2]   The neural reality of syntactic transformations: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Ben-Shachar, M ;
Hendler, T ;
Kahn, I ;
Ben-Bashat, D ;
Grodzinsky, Y .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (05) :433-440
[3]  
Chomsky N., 1958, Inf. Control, V1, P91, DOI [/10.1016/S0019-9958(58)90082-2, DOI 10.1016/S0019-9958(58)90082-2]
[4]  
Chomsky N., 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax
[5]   ERPs and domain specificity: Beating a straw horse [J].
Coulson, S ;
King, JW ;
Kutas, M .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1998, 13 (06) :653-672
[6]   Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: Evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies [J].
Dominey, PF ;
Hoen, M ;
Blanc, JM ;
Lelekov-Boissard, T .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 86 (02) :207-225
[7]   IS THE P300 COMPONENT A MANIFESTATION OF CONTEXT UPDATING [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
COLES, MGH .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :357-374
[8]   Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J].
Eimer, M ;
Goschke, T ;
Schlaghecken, F ;
Sturmer, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (04) :970-987
[9]   Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions [J].
Fiebach, CJ ;
Schlesewsky, M ;
Friederici, AD .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 47 (02) :250-272
[10]   Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI [J].
Fiebach, CJ ;
Schlesewsky, M ;
Friederici, AD .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2001, 30 (03) :321-338