The CALIPSO Lidar Cloud and Aerosol Discrimination: Version 2 Algorithm and Initial Assessment of Performance

被引:387
作者
Liu, Zhaoyan [1 ]
Vaughan, Mark [2 ]
Winker, David [2 ]
Kittaka, Chieko [3 ]
Getzewich, Brian [3 ]
Kuehn, Ralph [3 ]
Omar, Ali [2 ]
Powell, Kathleen [2 ]
Trepte, Charles [2 ]
Hostetler, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Aerosp, Hampton, VA USA
[2] NASA, Hampton, VA USA
[3] Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Hampton, VA USA
关键词
BACKSCATTER; EXTINCTION; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1175/2009JTECHA1229.1
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite was launched in April 2006 to provide global vertically resolved measurements of clouds and aerosols. Correct discrimination between clouds and aerosols observed by the lidar aboard the CALIPSO satellite is critical for accurate retrievals of cloud and aerosol optical properties and the correct interpretation of measurements. This paper reviews the theoretical basis of the CALIPSO lidar cloud and aerosol discrimination (CAD) algorithm, and describes the enhancements made to the version 2 algorithm that is used in the current data release (release 2). The paper also presents a preliminary assessment of the CAD performance based on one full day (12 August 2006) of expert manual classification and on one full month (July 2006) of the CALIOP 5-km cloud and aerosol layer products. Overall, the CAD algorithm works well in most cases. The 1-day manual verification suggests that the success rate is in the neighborhood of 90% or better. Nevertheless, several specific layer types are still misclassified with some frequency. Among these, the most prevalent are dense dust and smoke close to the source regions. The analysis of the July 2006 data showed that the misclassification of dust as cloud occurs for < 1% of the total tropospheric cloud and aerosol features found. Smoke layers are misclassified less frequently than are dust layers. Optically thin clouds in the polar regions can be misclassified as aerosols. While the fraction of such misclassifications is small compared with the number of aerosol features found globally, caution should be taken when studies are performed on the aerosol in the polar regions. Modifications will be made to the CAD algorithm in future data releases, and the misclassifications encountered in the current data release are expected to be reduced greatly.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1213
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] ACKERMAN SA, 1987, METEOR ATMOS PHYS, V41, P19
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, PCSCI202 NASA LANGL
  • [3] Comparison of various linear depolarization parameters measured by lidar
    Cairo, F
    Di Donfrancesco, G
    Adriani, A
    Pulvirenti, L
    Fierli, F
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 1999, 38 (21) : 4425 - 4432
  • [4] Cluster observations of electron holes in association with magnetotail reconnection and comparison to simulations -: art. no. A01211
    Cattell, C
    Dombeck, J
    Wygant, J
    Drake, JF
    Swisdak, M
    Goldstein, ML
    Keith, W
    Fazakerley, A
    André, M
    Lucek, E
    Balogh, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2005, 110 (A1)
  • [5] Charlson RJ, 2007, TELLUS B, V59, P715, DOI 10.1111/J.1600-0889.2007.00297.x
  • [6] Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data
    Herman, JR
    Bhartia, PK
    Torres, O
    Hsu, C
    Seftor, C
    Celarier, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D14) : 16911 - 16922
  • [7] Hess M, 1998, B AM METEOROL SOC, V79, P831, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0831:OPOAAC>2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] Hostetler C. A, 2006, PCSCI201 NASA LANGL
  • [10] CALIPSO/CALIOP Cloud Phase Discrimination Algorithm
    Hu, Yongxiang
    Winker, David
    Vaughan, Mark
    Lin, Bing
    Omar, Ali
    Trepte, Charles
    Flittner, David
    Yang, Ping
    Nasiri, Shaima L.
    Baum, Bryan
    Sun, Wenbo
    Liu, Zhaoyan
    Wang, Zhien
    Young, Stuart
    Stamnes, Knut
    Huang, Jianping
    Kuehn, Ralph
    Holz, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 26 (11) : 2293 - 2309