Impact numbers: measures of risk factor impact on the whole population from case-control and cohort studies

被引:34
作者
Heller, RF
Dobson, AJ
Attia, J
Page, J
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Med, Evidence Populat Hlth Unit, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ctr Clin Decis Anal, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.56.8.606
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe new measures of risk from case-control and cohort studies, which are simple to understand and relate to numbers of the population at risk. Design: Theoretical development of new measures of risk. Setting: Review of literature and previously described measures. Main results: The new measures are: (1) the population impact number (PIN), the number of those in the whole population among whom one case is attributable to the exposure or risk factor (this is equivalent to the reciprocal of the population attributable risk),- (2) the case impact number (CIN) the number of people with the disease or outcome for whom one case will be attributable to the exposure or risk factor (this is equivalent to the reciprocal of the population attributable fraction); (3) the exposure impact number (EIN) the number of people with the exposure among whom one excess case is attributable to the exposure (this is equivalent to the reciprocal of the attributable risk); (4) the exposed cases impact number (ECIN) the number of exposed cases among whom one case is attributable to the exposure (this is equivalent to the reciprocal of the aetiological fraction). The impact number reflects the number of people in each population (the whole population, the cases, all those exposed, and the exposed cases) among whom one case is attributable to the particular risk factor. Conclusions: These new measures should help communicate the impact on a population, of estimates of risk derived from cohort or case-control studies.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 610
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat [J].
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7168) :1309-1312
[2]   Expressing the magnitude of adverse effects in case-control studies: "the number of patients needed to be treated for one additional patient to be harmed" [J].
Bjerre, LM ;
LeLorier, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7233) :503-506
[3]   MORTALITY IN RELATION TO SMOKING - 20 YEARS OBSERVATIONS ON MALE BRITISH DOCTORS [J].
DOLL, R ;
PETO, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 2 (6051) :1525-1536
[4]   Case-control study of stroke and the quality of hypertension control in north west England [J].
Du, XL ;
Cruickshank, K ;
McNamee, R ;
Saraee, M ;
Sourbutts, J ;
Summers, A ;
Roberts, N ;
Walton, E ;
Holmes, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7076) :272-276
[5]   Disease impact number and population impact number: population perspectives to measures of risk and benefit [J].
Heller, RF ;
Dobson, AJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7266) :950-952
[6]   Number needed to treat: properties and problems [J].
Hutton, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2000, 163 :403-415
[7]   A note on the number needed to treat [J].
Lesaffre, E ;
Pledger, G .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 20 (05) :439-447
[8]   PROPORTION OF DISEASE CAUSED OR PREVENTED BY A GIVEN EXPOSURE, TRAIT OR INTERVENTION [J].
MIETTINE.OS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1974, 99 (05) :325-332
[9]  
ROTHMAN KJ, 1998, MODERN EPIDEMIOLOGY, P58
[10]  
SMEETH L, 2000, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V321, P953