The effects of loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical length: Implications for pregnancy

被引:40
作者
Gentry, DJ
Baggish, MS
Brady, K
Walsh, PM
Hungler, MS
机构
[1] Good Samaritan Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
[2] Good Samaritan Hosp, Hatton Med Res Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
关键词
cervical length; conization; loop excision of the transformation zone; transvaginal ultrasonography;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2000.104209
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether previously described significant and quantitative cervical shortening caused by loop excision of the transformation zone persists after 3 months of healing. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was designed in which 20 patients were enrolled. Each underwent transvaginal ultrasonography for determination of cervical length before the loop excision of the transformation zone and greater than or equal to 3 months after the loop excision of the transformation zone. Simple regression analysis and the Student paired t test was performed to determine whether the length of the cervix had changed significantly between the measurements. RESULTS: The mean cervical lengths as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography before and after loop excision of the transformation zone were 3.1 +/- 0.8 cm and 3.1 +/- 0.7 cml respectively. The correlation between ultrasonographic measurements before and after loop excision of the transformation zone was r = 0.88 (P < .0001). A paired t test resulted in a P value of 1.0000, which indicates that the ultrasonographic measurement after loop excision of the transformation zone was not different from the ultrasonographic measurement before loop excision of the transformation zone. The mean difference between measurements was 0.0 +/- 0.4 cm. CONCLUSION: After adequate healing time after loop excision of the transformation zone, the length of the cervix, as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography, does not appear to remain shortened.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 520
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1993, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V43, P212
[2]   PREDICTION OF RISK FOR PRETERM DELIVERY BY ULTRASONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF CERVICAL LENGTH [J].
ANDERSEN, HF ;
NUGENT, CE ;
WANTY, SD ;
HAYASHI, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (03) :859-867
[3]   ELECTROSURGICAL THIN LOOP CONIZATION BY SELECTIVE DOUBLE EXCISION [J].
BAGGISH, MS ;
NOEL, Y ;
BROOKS, M .
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 1991, 7 (02) :83-86
[4]   PREGNANCY OUTCOME AFTER LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE CERVICAL TRANSFORMATION ZONE [J].
BLOMFIELD, PI ;
BUXTON, J ;
DUNN, J ;
LUESLEY, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (03) :620-625
[5]   FERTILITY AND PREGNANCY OUTCOME FOLLOWING LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE CERVICAL TRANSFORMATION ZONE [J].
CRUICKSHANK, ME ;
FLANNELLY, G ;
CAMPBELL, DM ;
KITCHENER, HC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (06) :467-470
[6]   THE EFFECT OF CERVICAL LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION ON SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY OUTCOME - NORTH-AMERICAN EXPERIENCE [J].
FERENCZY, A ;
CHOUKROUN, D ;
FALCONE, T ;
FRANCO, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (04) :1246-1250
[7]   PREGNANCY FOLLOWING LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE [J].
HAFFENDEN, DK ;
BIGRIGG, A ;
CODLING, BW ;
READ, MD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (11) :1059-1060
[8]   THE OUTCOME OF PREGNANCY AFTER CO2-LASER CONIZATION OF THE CERVIX [J].
HAGEN, B ;
SKJELDESTAD, FE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (08) :717-720
[9]   The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery [J].
Iams, JD ;
Goldenberg, RL ;
Meis, PJ ;
Mercer, BM ;
Moawad, A ;
Das, A ;
Thom, E ;
McNellis, D ;
Copper, RL ;
Johnson, F ;
Roberts, JM ;
Hauth, JC ;
Northern, A ;
Neely, C ;
MuellerHeubach, E ;
Swain, M ;
Frye, A ;
Lindheimer, M ;
Jones, P ;
Brown, MEL ;
Siddiqi, TA ;
Elder, N ;
Coombs, T ;
VanHorn, J ;
Bain, R ;
Leuchtenburg, L ;
Fischer, M ;
Harger, JH ;
Cotroneo, M ;
Stallings, C ;
Yaffe, S ;
Catz, C ;
Klebanoff, M ;
Landon, MB ;
Schneider, J ;
Mueller, C ;
Carey, JC ;
Meier, A ;
Liles, E ;
Newman, RB ;
Collins, BA ;
Metcalf, T ;
Odell, V ;
Sibai, B ;
Ramsey, R ;
Fricke, JL ;
Treadwell, M ;
Norman, GS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (09) :567-572
[10]  
JACKSON GM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P214