Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Amygdaloideae T-& G-(Rosaceae)

被引:32
作者
Evans, RC
Dickinson, TA
机构
[1] Royal Ontario Museum, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Toronto, ON M5S 2C6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Bot, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
关键词
systematics; phylogeny; inflorescence typology; ovules; obturators;
D O I
10.1086/314175
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Relationships within the Amygdaloideae have long been a point of discussion in Rosaceae systematics. Oemleria, a monotypic genus, has been removed from the Amygdaloideae because of its five-pistillate gynoecium since all other genera have a single pistil. Exochorda, with its capsular fruit, has traditionally been placed in Spiraeoideae. Nevertheless, recent phylogenetic analyses of wood anatomy and rbcL sequence variation have demonstrated that both Exochorda and Oemleria should be included in an expanded Amygdaloideae. Comparisons of floral ontogeny in Prunus, Oemleria, and Exochorda, and the mature morphology of these genera and Prinsepia, support inclusion of Oemleria and Exochorda in Amygdaloideae. Inflorescence development demonstrates a close relationship between Exochorda and Oemleria. Gynoecium development in Erochorda and Oemleria is similar in some ways to that of some members of the Maloideae. All genera have a pair of collateral, bitegmic ovules, each of which is associated with an obturator that is composed of cells of the ventral margin of the locule.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 979
页数:25
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   FLOWERING PATTERN AND FRUIT PRODUCTION IN THE DIOECIOUS SHRUB OEMLERIA-CERASIFORMIS (ROSACEAE) [J].
ALLEN, GA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1986, 64 (06) :1216-1220
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, STUDY PLANT STRUCTUR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1940, MANUAL CULTIVATED TR, DOI DOI 10.1038/148007A0
[4]  
Baranov A., 1965, TAIWANIA, V11, P99
[5]  
BONNE G, 1928, RECHERCHES PEDICELLE
[6]  
BROOKS RM, 1940, HILGARDIA, V13, P219
[7]  
CARLQUIST S, 1969, PHYTOMORPHOLOGY, V19, P332
[8]  
Church A. H., 1908, TYPES FLORAL MECH 1
[9]  
Cusick F., 1966, TRENDS PLANT MORPHOG, P170
[10]  
DAHLGREN R, 1983, Nordic Journal of Botany, V3, P119, DOI 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1983.tb01448.x