Critical appraisal of treatment techniques based on conventional photon beams, intensity modulated photon beams and proton beams for therapy of intact breast

被引:68
作者
Fogliata, A [1 ]
Bolsi, A
Cozzi, L
机构
[1] Osped San Giovanni Bellinzona, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Phys Unit, Oncol Inst So Switzerland, CH-6504 Bellinzona, Switzerland
[2] Univ Milan, Med Phys Specializat Sch, Milan, Italy
关键词
three-dimensional conformal therapy; intensity modulated photon therapy; proton therapy; breast radiation therapy; comparative treatment planning;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00476-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyse different treatment techniques with conventional photon beams, intensity modulated photon beams, and proton beams for intact breast irradiation for patients in whom conventional irradiation would cause potentially dangerous lung irradiation. Material and methods: Five breast cancer patients with highly concave breast tissue volume around the lung were considered at planning level in order to assess the suitability of different irradiation techniques. Three-dimensional dose distributions for conventional two-field tangential photon treatment, two-field intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), three-field non-IMRT, three-field IMRT, and single-held proton treatment were investigated, aiming at assessing the possibility to reduce lung irradiation below risk levels. Analysis of dose-volume histograms and related physical and biological parameters (significant minimum, maximum and mean doses, conformity indexes and equivalent uniform dose (EUD)) for planned target volume (PTV) and lung was carried out. Dose plans were compared with the conventional two-field tangential photon technique. Results: PTV coverage was comparable for non-IMRT and IMRT techniques (EUD from 47.1 to 49.4 Gy), and improved with single-field proton treatment (EUD=49.8 Gy). Lung irradiation was reduced, in terms of mean dose, with three-field (9.5 Gy) and proton technique (3.5 Gy), with respect to the conventional two-field treatment (12.9 Gy): also a reduction of the lung volume irradiated at high doses was observed. Better results could be achieved with protons. In addition, cardiac irradiation was also reduced with those techniques. Conclusions: Geometrically difficult breast cancer patients could be irradiated with a three-field non-IMRT technique thus reducing the dose to the lung which is proposed as standard for this category of patients. Intensity modulated techniques were only marginally more successful than the corresponding non-IMRT treatments, while protons offer excellent results. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 145
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   A PENCIL BEAM MODEL FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION [J].
AHNESJO, A ;
SAXNER, M ;
TREPP, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :263-273
[2]  
[Anonymous], 50 ICRU S
[3]  
BARAL E, 1977, CANCER, V40, P2905, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197712)40:6<2905::AID-CNCR2820400621>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-Y
[5]   CANCER IN THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST AFTER RADIOTHERAPY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
BOICE, JD ;
HARVEY, EB ;
BLETTNER, M ;
STOVALL, M ;
FLANNERY, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (12) :781-785
[6]   X-RAY FIELD COMPENSATION WITH MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS [J].
BORTFELD, TR ;
KAHLER, DL ;
WALDRON, TJ ;
BOYER, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (03) :723-730
[7]   A LIMITED MEMORY ALGORITHM FOR BOUND CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION [J].
BYRD, RH ;
LU, PH ;
NOCEDAL, J ;
ZHU, CY .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 1995, 16 (05) :1190-1208
[8]   A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation [J].
Chang, SX ;
Deschesne, KM ;
Cullip, TJ ;
Parker, SA ;
Earnhart, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (05) :1305-1314
[9]  
Chen Y, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P855
[10]   Dosimetric features of linac head and phantom scattered radiation outside the clinical photon beam: experimental measurements and comparison with treatment planning system calculations [J].
Cozzi, L ;
Buffa, FM ;
Fogliata, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 58 (02) :193-200