Patient-controlled analgesia: what information does the patient want?

被引:23
作者
Chumbley, GM
Hall, GM
Salmon, P
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Pain Relief Unit, London SE5 9RS, England
[2] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, London SW17 0RE, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Clin Psychol, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
analgesia; patient-controlled; pain; postoperative; patient information; focus groups;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02311.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims of the study. To formulate and evaluate an information leaflet for patients using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), incorporating information thought to be important by patients. Rationale. The benefit of current information leaflets, written by professionals, has not been studied and their value to patients is unknown. Background. Previous studies have shown that information leaflets were poorly designed and written in language too difficult for patients to understand. Research methods. Seven focus groups were conducted to establish what information patients wanted to know about PCA. This information was incorporated into a new information leaflet. One hundred patients were randomized to receive either the new leaflet or the old leaflet in current use. A questionnaire was used to establish whether the new leaflet was more clear and informative than the old one. Results. Patients wanted to know that the drug used in PCA was morphine. They wanted more information about side-effects, needed to be reassured that it was safe, and that they could not overdose or become addicted. They wanted detailed instructions and diagrams about the technique. The questionnaire study established that the new leaflet was clearer and more informative. Conclusion. Patients' contribution led to major change, producing a leaflet which was clearer, more attractive, more informative and which proved more satisfactory to patients.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 471
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Aitken H A, 1990, Intensive Care Nurs, V6, P74, DOI 10.1016/0266-612X(90)90056-D
[2]   HOW READABLE ARE PRACTICE LEAFLETS [J].
ALBERT, T ;
CHADWICK, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6864) :1266-1268
[3]   Using quantitative and qualitative methods to pretest the publication: Take charge of your diabetes: A guide for care [J].
Anderson, LA ;
Satterfield, D ;
German, R ;
Anderson, RM .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1996, 22 (06) :598-604
[4]   Using focus groups to identify diabetes care and education issues for Latinos with diabetes [J].
Anderson, RM ;
Goddard, CE ;
Garcia, R ;
Guzman, JR ;
Vazquez, F .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1998, 24 (05) :618-625
[5]  
[Anonymous], COMM PROV SURG SERV
[6]   ESTIMATING SAMPLE SIZES FOR BINARY, ORDERED CATEGORICAL, AND CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES IN 2 GROUP COMPARISONS [J].
CAMPBELL, MJ ;
JULIOUS, SA ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7013) :1145-1148
[7]   Why do patients feel positive about patient-controlled analgesia? [J].
Chumbley, GM ;
Hall, GM ;
Salmon, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (04) :386-389
[8]   Patient-controlled analgesia: an assessment by 200 patients [J].
Chumbley, GM ;
Hall, GM ;
Salmon, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (03) :216-221
[9]   Audit of postoperative pain control - Influence of a dedicated acute pain nurse [J].
Coleman, SA ;
BookerMilburn, J .
ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (12) :1093-1096
[10]  
COULTER A, 1998, INFORMING PATIENTS A