GPs' awareness of patients' preference for place of death

被引:67
作者
Meeussen, Koen [1 ]
Van den Block, Lieve [1 ]
Bossuyt, Nathalie [2 ]
Bilsen, Johan [1 ]
Echteld, Michael [3 ]
Van Casteren, Viviane [2 ]
Deliens, Luc [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, End Life Care Res Grp, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Sci Inst Publ Hlth, Epidemiol Unit, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
advance care planning; end-of-life care; general practitioner; palliative care; preferred place of death; terminal care; BELGIAN SENTINEL NETWORK; TERMINALLY-ILL PATIENTS; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; CANCER-PATIENTS; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; PREFERRED PLACE; CARE; END; HOME; DIE;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp09X454124
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
100235 [预防医学];
摘要
Background Being able to die in one's place of choice is an indicator of the quality of end-of-life care. GPs may play a key role in exploring and honouring patients' preferences for place of death. Aim To examine how often GPs are informed about patients' preferred place of death, by whom and for which patients, and to study the expressed preferred place of death and how often patients die at their preferred place. Design of study One-year nationwide mortality retrospective study. Setting Sentinel Network of GPs in Belgium, 2006. Method GPs' weekly registration of all deaths (patients aged >= 1 year). Results A total of 798 non-sudden deaths were reported. GPs were informed of patients' preferred place of death in 46% of cases. GPs obtained this information directly from patients in 63%. GP awareness was positively associated with patients not being hospitalised in the last 3 months of life (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 5.6), involvement of informal caregivers (OR 3.3; 95% Cl = 1.8 to 6.1), use of a multidisciplinary palliative care team (OR = 2.5; 95% Cl = 1.8 to 3.5), and with presence of more than seven contacts between GP and patient or family in the last 3 months of life (OR = 3.0; 95% Cl = 2.2 to 4.3). In instances where GPs were informed, more than half of patients (58%) preferred to die at home. Overall, 80% of patients died at their preferred place. Conclusion GPs are often unaware of their patients' preference for place of death. However, if GPs are informed, patients often die at their preferred location. Several healthcare characteristics might contribute to this and to a higher level of GP awareness.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 670
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Aitken PV, 1999, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V59, P605
[2]
[Anonymous], 1997, APPROACHING DEATH IM
[3]
Place of death - how much does it matter? The priority is to improve end-of-life care in all settings [J].
Barclay, Stephen ;
Arthur, Antony .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2008, 58 (549) :229-231
[4]
Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC) [J].
Beccaro, M ;
Costantini, M ;
Rossi, PG ;
Miccinesi, G ;
Grimaldi, M ;
Bruzzi, P .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 (05) :412-416
[5]
BOFFIN N, 2007013 IPHEPI SCI I
[6]
Defining the patient population: one of the problems for palliative care research [J].
Borgsteede, SD ;
Deliens, L ;
Francke, AL ;
Stalman, WAB ;
Willems, DL ;
van Eijk, JT ;
van der Wal, G .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 20 (02) :63-68
[7]
Preferences for place of care and place of death among informal caregivers of the terminally ill [J].
Brazil, K ;
Howell, D ;
Bedard, M ;
Krueger, P ;
Heidebrecht, C .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 19 (06) :492-499
[8]
European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries [J].
Cohen, Joachim ;
Marcoux, Isabelle ;
Bilsen, Johan ;
Deboosere, Patrick ;
van der Wal, Gerrit ;
Deliens, Luc .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (03) :743-756
[9]
Crane MK, 2005, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V72, P1263
[10]
Recording and auditing preferred place of death [J].
Daley, Andrew ;
Sinclair, Karen .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 20 (06) :637-638