High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression ("positron emission mammography") is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer

被引:159
作者
Berg, Wendie A.
Weinberg, Irving N.
Narayanan, Deepa
Lobrano, Mary E.
Ross, Eric
Amodei, Laura
Tafra, Lorraine
Adler, Lee P.
Uddo, Joseph
Stein, William, III
Levine, Edward A.
机构
[1] Amer Radiol Serv, Johns Hopkins Green Spring, Lutherville Timonium, MD 21093 USA
[2] Naviscan PET Syst Inc, Rockville, MD USA
[3] E Jefferson Gen Hosp, Metairie, LA USA
[4] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[5] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[7] Anne Arundel Hlth Syst, Breast Ctr, Annapolis, MD USA
[8] Wake Forest Univ, Baptist Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
关键词
breast cancer; fluorodeoxyglucose; positron emission mammography; positron emission tomography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00269.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We sought to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of a high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET) scanner using mild breast compression (positron emission mammography [PEM]). Data were collected on concomitant medical conditions to assess potential confounding factors. At four centers, 94 consecutive women with known breast cancer or suspicious breast lesions received F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) intravenously, followed by PEM scans. Readers were provided clinical histories and x-ray mammograms (when available). After excluding inevaluable cases and two cases of lymphoma, PEM readings were correlated with histopathology for 92 lesions in 77 women: 77 index lesions (42 malignant), 3 ipsilateral lesions (3 malignant), and 12 contralateral lesions (3 malignant). Of 48 cancers, 16 (33%) were clinically evident; 11 (23%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 37 (77%) were invasive (30 ductal, 4 lobular, and 3 mixed; median size 21 mm). PEM depicted 10 of 11 (91%) DCIS and 33 of 37 (89%) invasive cancers. PEM was positive in 1 of 2 T1a tumors, 4 of 6 T1b tumors, 7 of 7 T1c tumors, and 4 of 4 cases where tumor size was not available (e.g., no surgical follow-up). PEM sensitivity for detecting cancer was 90%, specificity 86%, positive predictive value (PPV) 88%, negative predictive value (NPV) 88%, accuracy 88%, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (A(z)) 0.918. In three patients, cancer foci were identified only on PEM, significantly changing patient management. Excluding eight diabetic subjects and eight subjects whose lesions were characterized as clearly benign with conventional imaging, PEM sensitivity was 91%, specificity 93%, PPV 95%, NPV 88%, accuracy 92%, and A(z) 0.949 when interpreted with mammographic and clinical findings. FDG PEM has high diagnostic accuracy for breast lesions, including DCIS.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 323
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose:: Use and limitations [J].
Avril, N ;
Rosé, CA ;
Schelling, M ;
Dose, J ;
Kuhn, W ;
Bense, S ;
Weber, W ;
Ziegler, S ;
Graeff, H ;
Schwaiger, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (20) :3495-3502
[2]   Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [J].
Avril, N ;
Dose, J ;
Janicke, F ;
Bense, S ;
Ziegler, S ;
Laubenbacher, C ;
Romer, W ;
Pache, H ;
Herz, M ;
Allgayer, B ;
Nathrath, W ;
Graeff, H ;
Schwaiger, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (06) :1848-1857
[3]  
Avril N, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, P9
[4]   Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Bedrosian, I ;
Mick, R ;
Orel, SG ;
Schnall, M ;
Reynolds, C ;
Spitz, FR ;
Callans, LS ;
Buzby, GP ;
Rosato, EF ;
Fraker, DL ;
Czerniecki, BJ .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (03) :468-473
[5]   Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer [J].
Berg, WA ;
Gutierrez, L ;
NessAiver, MS ;
Carter, WB ;
Bhargavan, M ;
Lewis, RS ;
Ioffe, OB .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) :830-849
[6]   Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts [J].
Berg, WA .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 42 (05) :845-+
[7]   Occult breast cancer: Scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer [J].
Brem, RF ;
Rapelyea, JA ;
Zisman, G ;
Mohtashemi, K ;
Raub, J ;
Teal, CB ;
Majewski, S ;
Welch, BL .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) :274-280
[8]   FDG uptake in breast cancer:: correlation with biological and clinical prognostic parameters [J].
Buck, A ;
Schirrmeister, H ;
Kühn, T ;
Shen, CX ;
Kalker, T ;
Kotzerke, J ;
Dankerl, A ;
Glatting, G ;
Reske, S ;
Mattfeldt, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (10) :1317-1323
[9]   PET instrumentation: What are the limits? [J].
Budinger, TF .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (03) :247-267
[10]   Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and postoperative histopathology, hormone receptor status, thymidine labelling index and p53 in primary breast cancer:: a preliminary observation [J].
Crippa, F ;
Seregni, E ;
Agresti, R ;
Chiesa, C ;
Pascali, C ;
Bogni, A ;
Decise, D ;
De Sanctis, V ;
Greco, M ;
Daidone, MG ;
Bombardieri, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 25 (10) :1429-1434