Assay for the quantification of intact/fragmented genomic DNA

被引:43
作者
Georgiou, Christos D. [1 ]
Papapostolou, Ioannis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Biol, Sect Genet Cell Biol & Dev, Patras 26100, Greece
关键词
DNA; fragmentation; DNA size; Hoechst; PicoGreen;
D O I
10.1016/j.ab.2006.07.035
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study shows that the accuracy of the quantification of genomic DNA by the commonly used Hoechst- and PicoGreen-based assays is drastically affected by its degree of fragmentation. Specifically, it was shown that these assays underestimate by 70% the concentration of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) with sizes less than 23 kb. On the other hand, DNA sizes greater and less than approximately 23 kb are commonly characterized as intact and fragmented genomic DNA, respectively, by the agarose electrophoresis DNA smearing assay and are evaluated only qualitatively by this assay. The need for accurate quantification of fragmented and total genomic DNA, combined with the lack of specific, reliable, and simple quantitative methods, prompted us to develop a Hoechst/Pico Green-based fluorescent assay that quantifies both types of DNA. This assay addresses these problems, and in its Hoechst and PicoGreen version it accurately quantifies dsDNA as being either intact (>= 23 kb) or fragmented (< 23 kb) in concentrations as low as 3 ng ml(-1) or 5 pg ml(-1) with Hoechst or PicoGreen, respectively, as well as the individual fractions of intact/fragmented DNA existing in any proportions in a total DNA sample in concentrations as low as 10 ng ml-1 or 15 pg ml-1 with Hoechst or PicoGreen, respectively. Because the assay discriminates total genomic DNA in the two size ranges (>= 23 and < 23 kb) and quantitates them, it is proposed as the quantitative replacement of the agarose gel elect ropho resis genomic DNA smearing assay. sigma (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   PicoGreen quantitation of DNA: Effective evaluation of samples pre- or post-PCR [J].
Ahn, SJ ;
Costa, J ;
Emanuel, JR .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1996, 24 (13) :2623-2625
[2]   SHOTGUN DNA SEQUENCING USING CLONED DNASE I-GENERATED FRAGMENTS [J].
ANDERSON, S .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1981, 9 (13) :3015-3027
[3]   Mechanisms of enhanced apoptosis in HL-60 cells by UV-irradiated n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids [J].
Arita, K ;
Yamamoto, Y ;
Takehara, Y ;
Utsumi, T ;
Kanno, T ;
Miyaguchi, C ;
Akiyama, J ;
Yoshioka, T ;
Utsumi, K .
FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2003, 35 (02) :189-199
[4]  
BIRNBOIM CH, 1990, METHOD ENZYMOL, P550
[5]   Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm [J].
Chohan, KR ;
Griffin, JT ;
Lafromboise, M ;
De Jonge, CJ ;
Carrell, DT .
JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2006, 27 (01) :53-59
[6]   The comet assay: What can it really tell us? [J].
Collins, AR ;
Dobson, VL ;
Dusinska, M ;
Kennedy, G ;
Stetina, R .
MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1997, 375 (02) :183-193
[7]   Endogenous DNA damage in humans: a review of quantitative data [J].
De Bont, R ;
van Larebeke, N .
MUTAGENESIS, 2004, 19 (03) :169-185
[8]   FLUOROMETRIC QUANTIFICATION OF DNA IN CELLS AND TISSUE [J].
DOWNS, TR ;
WILFINGER, WW .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1983, 131 (02) :538-547
[9]  
Enger O, 1996, BIOTECHNIQUES, V21, P372
[10]   IDENTIFICATION OF PROGRAMMED CELL-DEATH INSITU VIA SPECIFIC LABELING OF NUCLEAR-DNA FRAGMENTATION [J].
GAVRIELI, Y ;
SHERMAN, Y ;
BENSASSON, SA .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1992, 119 (03) :493-501