Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution

被引:272
作者
Dosztanyi, Zsuzsanna
Chen, Jake
Dunker, A. Keith
Simon, Istvan
Tompa, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Enzymol, Biol Res Ctr, H-1518 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Informat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Purdue Sch Sci, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Computat Biol & Bioinformat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
disordered protein; unstructured protein; protein-protein interaction; interaction network; hub protein;
D O I
10.1021/pr060171o
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein interaction networks display approximate scale-free topology, in which hub proteins that interact with a large number of other proteins determine the overall organization of the network. In this study, we aim to determine whether hubs are distinguishable from other networked proteins by specific sequence features. Proteins of different connectednesses were compared in the interaction networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Homo sapiens with respect to the distribution of predicted structural disorder, sequence repeats, low complexity regions, and chain length. Highly connected proteins ("hub proteins") contained significantly more of, and greater proportion of, these sequence features and tended to be longer overall as compared to less connected proteins. These sequence features provide two different functional means for realizing multiple interactions: (1) extended interaction surface and (2) flexibility and adaptability, providing a mechanism for the same region to bind distinct partners. Our view contradicts the prevailing view that scaling in protein interactomes arose from gene duplication and preferential attachment of equivalent proteins. We propose an alternative evolutionary network specialization process, in which certain components of the protein interactome improved their fitness for binding by becoming longer or accruing regions of disorder and/or internal repeats and have therefore become specialized in network organization.
引用
收藏
页码:2985 / 2995
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
    Albert, R
    Jeong, H
    Barabási, AL
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 406 (6794) : 378 - 382
  • [2] Taking the mystery out of biological networks
    Aloy, P
    Russell, RB
    [J]. EMBO REPORTS, 2004, 5 (04) : 349 - 350
  • [3] Protein repeats: Structures, functions, and evolution
    Andrade, MA
    Perez-Iratxeta, C
    Ponting, CP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 134 (2-3) : 117 - 131
  • [4] Structure and evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks
    Babu, MM
    Luscombe, NM
    Aravind, L
    Gerstein, M
    Teichmann, SA
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) : 283 - 291
  • [5] Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources
    Bader, GD
    Hogue, CWV
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (10) : 991 - 997
  • [6] Network biology:: Understanding the cell's functional organization
    Barabási, AL
    Oltvai, ZN
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2004, 5 (02) : 101 - U15
  • [7] Intrinsic disorder is a key characteristic in partners that bind 14-3-3 proteins
    Bustos, DM
    Iglesias, AA
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 63 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [8] Scale-free networks from varying vertex intrinsic fitness -: art. no. 258702
    Caldarelli, G
    Capocci, A
    De Los Rios, P
    Muñoz, MA
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (25)
  • [9] Structural basis for recruitment of glycogen synthase kinase 3β to the axin-APC scaffold complex
    Dajani, R
    Fraser, E
    Roe, SM
    Yeo, M
    Good, VM
    Thompson, V
    Dale, TC
    Pearl, LH
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2003, 22 (03) : 494 - 501
  • [10] Protein interactions - Two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations
    Deane, CM
    Salwinski, L
    Xenarios, I
    Eisenberg, D
    [J]. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2002, 1 (05) : 349 - 356