Validation exercise of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study (ASAS) group response criteria in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with biologics

被引:29
作者
Stone, MA
Inman, RD
Wright, JG
Maetzel, A
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH | 2004年 / 51卷 / 03期
关键词
ankylosing spondylitis; infliximab; outcomes; ASAS; relative improvement criteria; validation;
D O I
10.1002/art.20414
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To define what expert clinicians consider a dramatic response in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with biologic therapies based on patient and physician assessments of global disease activity. To compare this expert clinician-derived criteria to the Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study (ASAS) Group criteria for improvement. Methods. Forty consecutive AS patients were treated in a 1-year open-label protocol with infliximab. Response to treatment at week 52 was defined using ASAS response criteria. For the purpose of this exercise, improvement using ASAS criteria was defined by consensus among experts as good with 50% improvement from baseline (ASAS(50)) and dramatic with 70% improvement from baseline (ASAS(70)). Experts established separate criteria for improvement in disease activity as good or dramatic based on patient and physician global assessment of disease activity. Results. Twelve of 40 patients met the ASAS(70) criteria, however, only, 8 met the expert definition of a dramatic improvement based on physician global scores and 5 met the expert definition of a dramatic improvement based on patient global assessment of disease activity. Agreement was poor between ASAS(50) or ASAS(70) and expert definition of improvement based on physician global scores (kappa < 0.3), but agreement was moderate to good between ASAS(50) or ASAS(70) and expert definition of improvement based on patient global scores, (kappa = 0.6-0.7). Conclusions. Differential response experienced by AS patients treated with infliximab was adequately captured by the ASAS composite improvement criteria. Overall, this study demonstrates the validity of the ASAS criteria for the detection of improvement in AS patients treated with biologics. However, the patient global assessment of disease activity may be sufficient to monitor changes in disease activity in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 320
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Anderson JJ, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V44, P1876, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1876::AID-ART326>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-F
[3]   Evaluation of the smallest detectable difference in outcome or process variables in ankylosing spondylitis [J].
Auleley, GR ;
Benbouazza, K ;
Spoorenberg, A ;
Collantes, E ;
Hajjaj-Hassouni, N ;
Van der Heijde, D ;
Dougados, M .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2002, 47 (06) :582-587
[4]   Employment, work disability, and work days lost in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a cross sectional study of Dutch patients [J].
Boonen, A ;
Chorus, A ;
Miedema, H ;
van der Heijde, D ;
van der Tempel, H ;
van der Linden, S .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2001, 60 (04) :353-358
[5]  
Brandt J, 2002, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V46, pS380
[6]   Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab:: a randomised controlled multicentre trial [J].
Braun, J ;
Brandt, J ;
Listing, J ;
Zink, A ;
Alten, R ;
Golder, W ;
Gromica-Ihle, E ;
Kellner, H ;
Krause, A ;
Schneider, M ;
Sörensen, H ;
Zeidler, H ;
Thriene, W ;
Sieper, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9313) :1187-1193
[7]  
Braun J, 1998, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V41, P58, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199801)41:1<58::AID-ART8>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-7
[9]  
CALIN A, 1994, J RHEUMATOL, V21, P2281