Defining pelvic factors in sphincter-preservation of low rectal cancer with a three-dimensional digital model of pelvis

被引:23
作者
Gu, Jin [1 ]
Bo, Xue Feng
Xiong, Chun Yang
Wu, Ai Wen
Zhang, Xiao Peng
Li, Ming
An, Qi
Fang, Jing
Li, Jie
Zhang, Xuan
Wang, Hong Yi
Gao, Fei
You, Wei Cheng
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Oncol, Beijing 100036, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Mech & Engn Sci, Beijing 100036, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Oncol, Beijing 100036, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Dept Med Stat, Sch Oncol, Beijing 100036, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Sch Oncol, Beijing 100036, Peoples R China
关键词
rectal neoplasma; pelvis; sphincter preservation; digital model;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-006-0665-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Surgeons often can contribute failure of sphincter-preserving procedure to a limitation of pelvis anatomy; however, the), cannot determine definitely which anatomic diameter or spatial factor actually affected the success of the procedure. METHODS: Colorectal surgeons, radiologists, and research fellows collaborated closely to establish a three-dimensional digital model of the pelvis with spiral computerized tomography scanning data of patients with rectal cancer. Retrospective analysis on data of 97 patients with low rectal cancer was performed with this model to identify geometric factors that might affect a successful sphincter preservation procedure for low rectal cancer. RESULTS: A digital pelvic model was established. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that distance from the anal verge, body mass index, and pelvic factors affected the success of sphincter preservation. Sphincter preservation was more likely to succeed when the distance from analverge was >= 5 cut and body mass index was <25 kg/m(2). Shorter diameter from the upper pubis to the sacrococcyx, distance of sacrococcyx, and excessive curvature of the sacrum predicted failure of sphincter preservation in certain cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic diameters could affect the success of sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer patients besides the distance from anal verge and body mass index.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1526
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Arbman, G ;
Nilsson, E ;
Hallbook, O ;
Sjodahl, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) :375-379
[2]
Surgery for colorectal cancer [J].
Dorudi, S ;
Steele, RJ ;
McArdle, CS .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 64 :101-118
[3]
ENKER WE, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V181, P335
[4]
Fleming ID, 1997, AJCC MANUAL STAGING, V5th
[5]
Goh V, 2004, CLIN RADIOL, V59, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2003.08.013
[6]
Preliminary results of preoperative 5-fluorouracil, low-dose leucovorin, and concurrent radiation therapy for clinically resectable T3 rectal cancer [J].
Grann, A ;
Minsky, BD ;
Cohen, AM ;
Saltz, L ;
Guillem, JG ;
Paty, PB ;
Kelsen, DP ;
Kemeny, N ;
Ilson, D ;
BassLoeb, J .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (05) :515-522
[7]
Narrow pubic arch and increased risk of failure for vaginal hysterectomy [J].
Harmanli, OH ;
Khilnani, R ;
Dandolu, V ;
Chatwani, AJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (04) :697-700
[8]
THE MESORECTUM IN RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY - THE CLUE TO PELVIC RECURRENCE [J].
HEALD, RJ ;
HUSBAND, EM ;
RYALL, RDH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (10) :613-616
[9]
Pelvic radiological imaging: a surgeon's perspective [J].
Herbst, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 47 (02) :135-141
[10]
Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: Randomized controlled trial [J].
Ho, YH ;
Seow-Choen, F ;
Tan, M .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 25 (07) :876-881