Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study

被引:88
作者
Hantes, Michael Elias [1 ]
Zachos, Vasilios C. [1 ]
Liantsis, Athanasios [1 ]
Venouziou, Aaron [1 ]
Karantanas, Apostolos H. [2 ]
Malizos, Konstantinos N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessalia, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Univ Hosp Larissa, Mezourlo, Larissa, Greece
[2] Univ Crete, Dept Radiol, Univ Hosp, Iraklion, Greece
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Transtibial technique; Anteromedial portal technique; Magnetic resonance imaging; FEMORAL TUNNEL PLACEMENT; CORONAL PLANE; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; TIBIAL TUNNEL; LAXITY; ANGLE;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-009-0738-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in graft orientation between transtibial (TT) and anteromedial (AM) portal technique using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Fifty-six patients who were undergoing ACL reconstruction underwent MRI of their healthy and reconstructed knee. Thirty patients had ACL reconstruction using the TT (group A), while in the remaining 26 the AM (group B) was used. In the femoral part graft orientation was evaluated in the coronal plane using the femoral graft angle (FGA). The FGA was defined as the angle between the axis of the femoral tunnel and the joint line. In the tibial part graft orientation was evaluated in the sagittal plane using the tibial graft angle (TGA). The TGA was defined as the angle between the axis of the tibial tunnel and a line perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia. The ACL angle of the normal knee in the sagittal view was also calculated. The mean FGA for group A was 72A degrees, while for the group B was 53A degrees and this was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean TGA for group A was 64A degrees, while for the group B was 63A degrees (P = 0.256). The mean intact ACL angle for group A was 52A degrees, while for the group B was 51A degrees. The difference between TGA and intact ACL angle was statistically significant (P < 0.001) for both groups. Using the AM portal technique, the ACL graft is placed in a more oblique direction in comparison with the TT technique in the femoral part. However, there are no differences between the two techniques in graft orientation in the tibial part. Normal sagittal obliquity is not restored with both techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 886
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study [J].
Ahn, Jin Hwan ;
Lee, Sang Hak ;
Yoo, Jae Chul ;
Ha, Hae Chan .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (11) :1293-1300
[2]
ARNOCZKY SP, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P19
[3]
Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study [J].
Arnold, MP ;
Kooloos, J ;
van Kampen, A .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 9 (04) :194-199
[4]
Comparison of sagittal obliquity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament with native anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Ayerza, MA ;
Múscolo, DL ;
Costa-Paz, M ;
Makino, A ;
Rondón, L .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2003, 19 (03) :257-261
[5]
Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: A cadaveric dissection and radiographic study [J].
Colombet, Philippe ;
Robinson, James ;
Christel, Pascal ;
Franceschi, Jean-Pierre ;
Djian, Patrick ;
Bellier, Guy ;
Sbihi, Abdou .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (09) :984-992
[6]
Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: A cadaveric study [J].
Gavriilidis, Iosif ;
Motsis, Efstathios K. ;
Pakos, Emilios E. ;
Georgoulis, Anastasios D. ;
Mitsionis, Gregory ;
Xenakis, Theodore A. .
KNEE, 2008, 15 (05) :364-367
[7]
Getelman M H, 1999, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V7, P189
[8]
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the Bio-TransFix femoral fixation device and anteromedial portal technique [J].
Hantes, ME ;
Dailiana, Z ;
Zachos, VC ;
Varitimidis, SE .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (05) :497-501
[9]
Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the new millennium: a global perspective [J].
Harner, CD ;
Fu, FH ;
Irrgang, JJ ;
Vogrin, TM .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 9 (06) :330-336
[10]
Harner CD, 2008, ARTHROSCOPY, V24, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.019