A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography - A signal-to-noise analysis

被引:90
作者
Lemacks, MR [1 ]
Kappadath, SC [1 ]
Shaw, CC [1 ]
Liu, XM [1 ]
Whitman, GJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
dual-energy subtraction imaging; digital mammography; microcalcifications; signal-to-noise ratio;
D O I
10.1118/1.1494832
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Breast cancer may manifest as microcalcifications (muCs) in x-ray mammography. However, the detection and visualization of muCs are often obscured by the overlapping tissue structures. The dual-energy subtraction imaging technique offers an alternative approach for imaging and visualizing muCs. With this technique, separate high- and low-energy images are acquired and their differences are used to "cancel" out the background tissue structures. However, the subtraction process could increase the statistical noise level relative to the calcification contrast. Therefore, a key issue with the dual-energy subtraction imaging technique is to weigh the benefit of removing the cluttered background tissue structure over the drawback of reduced signal-to-noise ratio in the subtracted muC images. In this report, a theoretical framework for calculating the (quantum) noise in the subtraction images is developed and the numerical computations are described. We estimate the noise levels in the dual-energy subtraction signals under various imaging conditions, including the x-ray spectra, muC size, tissue composition, and breast thickness. The selection of imaging parameters is optimized to evaluate the feasibility of using a dual-energy subtraction technique for the improved detection and visualization of muCs. We present the results and discuss its dependence on imaging parameters. (C) 2002 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1739 / 1751
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
[Anonymous], TABLES XRAY MASS ATT, DOI DOI 10.18434/T4D01F
[2]
[Anonymous], 1983, Medical Imaging Systems
[3]
DUAL-ENERGY SUBTRACTION MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
ASAGA, T ;
MASUZAWA, C ;
YOSHIDA, A ;
MATSUURA, H .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1995, 8 (01) :70-73
[4]
BARNES GT, 1985, RECENT DEV DIGITAL I, P16
[5]
Barten P. G. J, 1999, CONTRAST SENSITIVITY
[6]
BIRCH R, 1979, CATALOGUE SPECTRAL D
[7]
DUAL-ENERGY MAMMOGRAPHY - A DETECTOR ANALYSIS [J].
BOONE, JM ;
SHABER, GS ;
TECOTZKY, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (04) :665-675
[8]
COLOR MAMMOGRAPHY - IMAGE GENERATION AND RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC EVALUATION [J].
BOONE, JM .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1991, 26 (06) :521-527
[9]
Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms - A signal-to-noise study [J].
Breitenstein, DS ;
Shaw, CC .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1998, 11 (03) :137-150
[10]
DUAL-ENERGY DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY UTILIZING STIMULATED PHOSPHOR COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY [J].
BRETTLE, DS ;
COWEN, AR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (11) :1989-2004