Sonographic examination does not predict twin growth discordance accurately

被引:54
作者
Caravello, JW
Chauhan, SP
Morrison, JC
Magann, EF
Martin, JN
Devoe, LD
机构
[1] MED COLL GEORGIA,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,AUGUSTA,GA 30912
[2] UNIV MISSISSIPPI,JACKSON,MS 39216
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00010-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective: To assess the accuracy of estimating birth weight among twins with discordancy (intra-pair difference in actual birth weight of more than 25%) and to determine the relative accuracy of an intra-pair difference in abdominal circumference (Delta AC) of 20 mm or more or in estimated fetal weight (Delta EFW) of 25% or more for the identification of discordant growth in twins. Methods: Over a C-year period, we identified all non-anomalous twin pairs with gestational ages greater than 23 weeks and sonographic examinations within 3 weeks of birth. Ultrasonographic biometry of both twins included AC, head circumference, and femur length; these indices were used to estimate fetal weight by Hadlock's formula. Likelihood ratios, receiver-operating characteristic curves, and prediction limits were applied to assess the accuracy of the two diagnostic methods to predict an abnormal outcome. Results: A total of 242 twin pairs were studied. The mean gestational age among the 21 twins with abnormal growth (30.6 +/- 4.6 weeks) was significantly less than among the 221 twins with normal growth (33.2 +/- 4.0 weeks) (P < .005). The biometric measurements of fetal parts, sonographic estimate of fetal weight, and actual birth weight for both fetuses were significantly less for discordant twin pairs (P < .05). The accuracy of predicting birth weight, as determined by mean error and percentage of the estimate within 10% of the actual weight, was similar between the groups. Receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that both diagnostic tests yielded areas under the two curves not significantly different from the area under the nondiagnostic line (P > .05). Most important, prediction limit calculations indicated that a 90% certainty that the actual birth weight discordance was at least 25% was achievable only if Delta AC was 172 mm or greater or Delta EFW was 112% or more. Conclusion: The most popular current methods (difference in AC or EFW) for predicting discordant growth in twin gestations have limited accuracy when held to a standard for discordance that requires a birth weight difference of at least 25%. (C) 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 533
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
BABSON SG, 1964, PEDIATRICS, V33, P327
[2]
BECK JR, 1986, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V110, P13
[3]
ULTRASONIC PREDICTION OF GROWTH DISCORDANCY BY INTERTWIN DIFFERENCE IN ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE [J].
BLICKSTEIN, I ;
FRIEDMAN, A ;
CASPI, B ;
LANCET, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1989, 29 (02) :121-124
[4]
HOW ACCURATE IS ANTENATAL SONOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION OF DISCORDANT BIRTH-WEIGHT IN TWINS [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, P ;
MURPHY, M ;
COMERFORD, FR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1991, 40 (02) :91-96
[5]
CHAUHAN SP, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P523
[6]
Chauhan SP, 1996, J REPROD MED, V41, P403
[7]
DISCORDANT TWINS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF THE DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF REAL-TIME ULTRASONOGRAPHY COMBINED WITH UMBILICAL ARTERY VELOCIMETRY [J].
DIVON, MY ;
GIRZ, BA ;
SKLAR, A ;
GUIDETTI, DA ;
LANGER, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (03) :757-760
[8]
ERKKOLA R, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P203
[9]
SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT - THE VALUE OF FEMUR LENGTH IN ADDITION TO HEAD AND ABDOMEN MEASUREMENTS [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
CARPENTER, RJ ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 150 (02) :535-540
[10]
HILL LM, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V84, P501