XPS topofactors: determining overlayer thickness on particles and fibres

被引:68
作者
Shard, A. G. [1 ]
Wang, J. [1 ]
Spencer, S. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Phys Lab, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
关键词
XPS; topography; fibres; particles; nanoparticles; angle-resolved; ROUGH SURFACES; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1002/sia.3044
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We introduce the concept of an XPS 'Topofactor', which can be used in conjunction with the XPS 'Thickogram', to provide overlayer thicknesses on topographic samples of known geometry. The concept is essentially simple; analysis is performed with the sample normal directed towards the XPS analyser, the equivalent planar thickness is calculated from the Thickogram and the Topofactor applied to the result to provide the actual thickness. The Topofactor is thus defined as the ratio of the true overlayer thickness to the apparent overlayer thickness obtained by assuming the sample is ideally planar. Within this paper we describe how Topofactors can be calculated and consider cylinders (fibres) and spheres (particles) in some detail. For spheres, a Topofactor of 0.67 is a useful average value and for cylinders, a Topofactor of 0.79 is useful, (i.e. similar to 2/3 and 4/5, respectively) both values would typically provide overlayer thicknesses within 10% of the actual value. An analytical description of cylindrical and spherical Topofactors to within 1% error is provided which accounts for variations in thickness and relative electron attenuation lengths. The Topofactors are useful for macroscopic and microscopic samples, but not for nanoscopic samples such as nanofibres and nanoparticles. In this case, we provide an analytical model that can predict the relative XPS signals from the core and the shell of nanomaterials to an error that is typically better than 10%. (C) Crown copyright 2009. Reproduced with the permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 548
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Chatelier RC, 1997, SURF INTERFACE ANAL, V25, P741, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199709)25:10<741::AID-SIA295>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-#
[3]  
Cumpson PJ, 2000, SURF INTERFACE ANAL, V29, P403, DOI 10.1002/1096-9918(200006)29:6<403::AID-SIA884>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-8
[5]   QUANTITATION OF COVERAGES ON ROUGH SURFACES BY XPS - AN OVERVIEW [J].
FULGHUM, JE ;
LINTON, RW .
SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 1988, 13 (04) :186-192
[6]   Surface roughness effects in quantitative XPS: magic angle for determining overlayer thickness [J].
Gunter, PLJ ;
Gijzeman, OLJ ;
Niemantsverdriet, JW .
APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 1997, 115 (04) :342-346
[7]   Overlayer thickness determination by angular dependent X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ADXPS) of rough surfaces with a spherical topography [J].
Kappen, P ;
Reihs, K ;
Seidel, C ;
Voetz, M ;
Fuchs, H .
SURFACE SCIENCE, 2000, 465 (1-2) :40-50
[8]   Calculation of layer thickness on rough surfaces by polyhedral model [J].
Mohai, M. .
SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2008, 40 (3-4) :710-713
[9]   Calculation of overlayer thickness on curved surfaces based on XPS intensities [J].
Mohai, M ;
Bertóti, I .
SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2004, 36 (08) :805-808
[10]   Modeling of complex surface structures for ARXPS [J].
Oswald, S. ;
Oswald, F. .
SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2008, 40 (3-4) :700-705