Specific differentially methylated domain sequences direct the maintenance of methylation at imprinted genes

被引:26
作者
Reinhart, Bonnie
Paoloni-Giacobino, Ariane
Chaillet, J. Richard
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Mol Genet & Biochem, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Human Genet, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Pediat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/MCB.00981-06
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Landmark features of imprinted genes are differentially methylated, domains (DMDs), in which one parental allele is methylated on CpG dinucleotides and the opposite allele is unmethylated. Genetic experiments in the mouse have shown that DMDs are required for the parent-specific expression of linked clusters of imprinted genes. To understand the mechanism whereby the differential methylation is established and maintained, we analyzed a series of transgenes containing DMD sequences and showed that imperfect tandem repeats from DMDs associated with. the Snurf/Snrpn, Kcnq1, and Igf2r gene clusters govern transgene imprinting. For the Igf2r DMD the minimal imprinting signal is two unit copies of the tandem repeat. This imprinted transgene behaves identically to endogenous imprinted genes in Dnmt1o and Dnmt3L mutant mouse backgrounds. The primary function of the imprinting signal within the transgene DMD is to maintain, during embryogenesis and a critical period of genomic reprogramming, parent-specific DNA methylation states established in the germ line. This work advances our understanding of the imprinting mechanism by defining a genomic signal that dependably perpetuates an epigenetic state during postzygotic development.
引用
收藏
页码:8347 / 8356
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Ainscough JFX, 1997, DEVELOPMENT, V124, P3621
[2]   Stochastic imprinting in the progeny of Dnmt3L-/- females [J].
Arnaud, P ;
Hata, K ;
Kaneda, M ;
Li, E ;
Sasaki, H ;
Feil, R ;
Kelsey, G .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2006, 15 (04) :589-598
[3]   De novo deletions of SNRPN exon 1 in early human and mouse embryos result in a paternal to maternal imprint switch [J].
Bielinska, B ;
Blaydes, SM ;
Buiting, K ;
Yang, T ;
Krajewska-Walasek, M ;
Horsthemke, B ;
Brannan, CI .
NATURE GENETICS, 2000, 25 (01) :74-78
[4]   The SNRPN promoter is not required for genomic imprinting of the PraderWilli/Angelman domain in mice [J].
Bressler, J ;
Tsai, TF ;
Wu, MY ;
Tsai, SF ;
Ramirez, MA ;
Armstrong, D ;
Beaudet, AL .
NATURE GENETICS, 2001, 28 (03) :232-240
[5]   REGULATION OF GENOMIC IMPRINTING BY GAMETIC AND EMBRYONIC PROCESSES [J].
CHAILLET, JR ;
BADER, DS ;
LEDER, P .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 9 (10) :1177-1187
[6]  
CLARK SJ, 1994, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V22, P2990, DOI 10.1093/nar/22.15.2990
[7]   A NULL C-MYC MUTATION CAUSES LETHALITY BEFORE 10.5 DAYS OF GESTATION IN HOMOZYGOTES AND REDUCED FERTILITY IN HETEROZYGOUS FEMALE MICE [J].
DAVIS, AC ;
WIMS, M ;
SPOTTS, GD ;
HANN, SR ;
BRADLEY, A .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 7 (04) :671-682
[8]   Sequence and functional comparison in the Beckwith-Wiedemann region:: implications for a novel imprinting centre and extended imprinting [J].
Engemann, S ;
Strödicke, M ;
Paulsen, M ;
Franck, O ;
Reinhardt, R ;
Lane, N ;
Reik, W ;
Walter, J .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2000, 9 (18) :2691-2706
[9]   Regional loss of imprinting and growth deficiency in mice with a targeted deletion of KvDMR1 [J].
Fitzpatrick, GV ;
Soloway, PD ;
Higgins, MJ .
NATURE GENETICS, 2002, 32 (03) :426-431
[10]  
Glenn CC, 1996, AM J HUM GENET, V58, P335