Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects

被引:755
作者
Mallinckrodt, Brent
Abraham, W. Todd
Wei, Meifen
Russell, Daniel W.
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Educ Sch & Counseling Psychol, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Human Dev & Family Studies, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Iowa State Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Social & Behav Res, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
statistical mediation; bootstrap methods; test of joint significance; statistical power;
D O I
10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
P. A. Frazier, A. P. Tix, and K. E. Barron (2004) highlighted a normal theory method popularized by R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) for testing the statistical significance of indirect effects (i.e., mediator variables) in multiple regression contexts. However, simulation studies suggest that this method lacks statistical power relative to some other approaches. The authors describe an alternative developed by P. E. Shrout and N. Bolger (2002) based on bootstrap resampling methods. An example and step-by-step guide for performing bootstrap mediation analyses are provided. The test of joint significance is also briefly described as an alternative to both the normal theory and bootstrap methods. The relative advantages and disadvantages of each approach in terms of precision in estimating confidence intervals of indirect effects, Type I error, and Type II error are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 378
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条