The meaning of diagnostic test results: A spreadsheet for swift data analysis

被引:69
作者
Maceneaney, PM [1 ]
Malone, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
diagnostic techniques; procedures; imaging; radiology; Bayes' theorem; sensitivity; specificity; likelihood functions; decision making; computers; software;
D O I
10.1053/crad.1999.0444
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIMS: To design a spreadsheet program to: (a) analyse rapidly diagnostic test result data produced in local research or reported in the literature; (b) correct reported predictive values for disease prevalence in any population; (c) estimate the post-test probability of disease in individual patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microsoft Excel(TM) was used, Section A: a contingency (2 x 2) table was incorporated into the spreadsheet. Formulae for standard calculations [sample size, disease prevalence, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, predictive values and likelihood ratios (LRs)] were linked to this table. The results change automatically when the data in the true or false negative and positive cells are changed. Section B: this estimates predictive values in any population, compensating for altered disease prevalence. Sections C-F: Bayes' theorem was incorporated to generate individual post-test probabilities. The spreadsheet generates 95% confidence intervals, LRs and a table and graph of conditional probabilities once the sensitivity and specificity of the test are entered. The tatter shows the expected post-test probability of disease for any pre-test probability when a test of known sensitivity and specificity is positive or negative, RESULTS: This spreadsheet can be used on desktop and palmtop computers. The MS Excel(TM) version can be downloaded via the Internet from the URL ftp://radiography.com/pub/Rad-data99.xls CONCLUSION: A spreadsheet is useful for contingency table data analysis and assessment of the clinical meaning of diagnostic test results. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 235
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   OPTIMUM UTILIZATION OF RADIOLOGICAL TESTS - THE RADIOLOGIST AS ADVISOR [J].
ARMSTRONG, P ;
BLACK, WC .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1989, 40 (05) :444-447
[2]   EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS WITH MULTIPLE DIAGNOSTIC CATEGORIES [J].
BIRKETT, NJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 41 (05) :491-494
[3]   HOW TO EVALUATE THE RADIOLOGY LITERATURE [J].
BLACK, WC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (01) :17-22
[4]   COMMUNICATING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RADIOLOGIC TEST-RESULTS - THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO [J].
BLACK, WC ;
ARMSTRONG, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (06) :1313-1318
[5]   DEFINITION OF TERMS USED TO JUDGE THE EFFICACY OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS - A GRAPHIC APPROACH [J].
BRISMAR, J ;
JACOBSSON, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) :621-623
[6]  
CHANG P J, 1988, AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, V152, P721
[7]   Is minimal preparation computed tomography comparable with barium enema in elderly patients with colonic symptoms? [J].
Domjan, J ;
Blaquiere, R ;
Odurny, A .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 53 (12) :894-898
[8]   STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING - APPLICATIONS TO DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY [J].
DOUBILET, PM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 150 (04) :745-750
[9]   LIKELIHOOD RATIOS - A REAL IMPROVEMENT FOR CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING [J].
DUJARDIN, B ;
VANDENENDE, J ;
VANGOMPEL, A ;
UNGER, JP ;
VANDERSTUYFT, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 10 (01) :29-36
[10]   USE OF STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS IN THE AJR AND RADIOLOGY - FREQUENCY, METHODS, AND SUBSPECIALTY DIFFERENCES [J].
ELSTER, AD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (03) :711-715