Nanofiller loading level: influence on selected properties of an adhesive resin

被引:40
作者
Conde, M. C. M. [1 ]
Zanchi, C. H. [1 ]
Rodrigues-Junior, S. A. [2 ]
Carreno, N. L. V. [1 ,3 ]
Ogliari, F. A. [1 ]
Piva, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Sch Dent, Biomat Dev & Control Ctr, BR-96015560 Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Pelotas, Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent, BR-96015560 Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Pelotas, Inst Chem & Geosci, Dept Analyt & Inorgan Chem, BR-96015560 Pelotas, RS, Brazil
关键词
Dentin adhesive; Nanofiller; Cohesive strength; Weibull analysis; Degree of conversion; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; DENTAL COMPOSITES; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; WEIBULL ANALYSIS; BOND STRENGTHS; FILLER; CONVERSION; NANOCOMPOSITES; MONOMER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of the filler content in the cohesive strength (sigma), Weibull modulus (m) and degree of conversion (DC) of an experimental adhesive system. Methods: A HEMA/Bis-GMA/TEGDMA-based adhesive was formulated and filled with silica nanofillers in the following weight percentages (wt%): R0 = 0%; R1 = 1%; R3 = 3%; R5 = 5% and R10 = 10%. The adhesive of Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP) system was used as a commercial reference. Twenty dumbbell-shaped specimens with cross-sectional area of 0.5 mm(2) were made per group and tensile tested with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture. The cohesive strength was calculated in MPa. DC was obtained through FTIR after light curing for 25 s. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05) and to Weibull analysis. Results: Mean a results were: R0 = 65.4 +/- 8.4; R1 = 73.2 +/- 8.8; R3 = 72.0 +/- 8.4; R5 = 73.1 +/- 9.7; R10 = 85.5 +/- 13.1 and SBMP = 79.0 +/- 11.0 MPa. R10 presented the highest sigma, while R0 showed the lowest. R5 and SBMP did not differ significantly (p < 0.05). Weibull analysis revealed no significant difference in structural reliability between groups. The experimental adhesives presented similar results of DC, which, in turn, were significantly higher than the SBMP. Conclusions: The addition of 10% filler in weight improves the cohesive strength of the adhesive, not interfering in the structural reliability or the degree of conversion. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 335
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites [J].
Asmussen, E ;
Peutzfeldt, A .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (01) :51-56
[2]
2,3-Epithiopropyl methacrylate as functionalized monomer in a dental adhesive [J].
Aulo Ogliari, Fabricio ;
Luiza Tebaldi de Sordi, Marli ;
Antonio Ceschi, Marco ;
Liberato Petzhold, Cesar ;
Fernando Demarco, Flavio ;
Piva, Evandro .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2006, 34 (07) :472-477
[3]
BRANNSTROM M, 1984, OPER DENT, V9, P57
[4]
Analysis of tensile bond strengths using Weibull statistics [J].
Burrow, MF ;
Thomas, D ;
Swain, MV ;
Tyas, MJ .
BIOMATERIALS, 2004, 25 (20) :5031-5035
[5]
Weibull analysis and flexural strength of hot-pressed core veneered ceramic structures [J].
Della Bona, A ;
Anusavice, KJ ;
DeHoff, PH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2003, 19 (07) :662-669
[6]
Interpretation of bond failure through conversion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents [J].
Dickens, SH ;
Cho, BH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2005, 21 (04) :354-364
[7]
The effect of resin matrix composition on the polymerization shrinkage and rheological properties of experimental dental composites [J].
Ellakwa, Ayman ;
Cho, Nakyeon ;
Lee, In Bog .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2007, 23 (10) :1229-1235
[8]
Ferracane J L, 1985, Dent Mater, V1, P11, DOI 10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80058-0
[9]
Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks [J].
Ferracane, JL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2006, 22 (03) :211-222
[10]
Ferracane JL, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V42, P465, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<465::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO