Results of the American Association of Bioanalysts national proficiency testing programme in andrology

被引:77
作者
Keel, BA
Quinn, P
Schmidt, CF
Serafy, NT
Serafy, NT
Schalue, TK
机构
[1] Sage BioPharma, San Clemente, CA USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Womens Res Inst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Wichita, KS 67214 USA
[3] Amer Assoc Bioanalysts Proficiency Testing Serv, Brownsville, TX USA
关键词
antisperm antibodies; proficiency testing; sperm count; sperm morphology; sperm vitality;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/15.3.680
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Proficiency testing samples for antisperm antibodies (ASAB), sperm count, morphology and vitality were mailed to participating laboratories. The majority participating utilized Immunobead ASAB procedures (81 versus 14% mixed antiglobulin reaction and 5% 'other'), and there was 95.6 +/- 1.2% agreement on the presence or absence of ASAB, The majority of laboratories utilized manual (79%) versus computer assisted semen analysis (CASA; 15%) methods. Approximately 64% used the haemocytometer and 26% used the Makler counting chambers for manual counts. Coefficients of variation (CV) in sperm counts ranged from 24 to 138%, with CASA displaying lower overall CV (53 +/- 8%) than manual methods (80 +/- 9%). A wide variation in the reports of percent normal morphology was noted (CVs calculated from are sin transformed means ranged from 15 to 93%). Participants using American Society of Clinical Pathologists (ASCP) criteria reported sperm morphology values that were clustered in the 'normal' range (11 out of 12 samples), while those using strict criteria were clustered in the 'abnormal' range (10 out of 12 samples). Good agreement was observed in sperm vitality (overall mean CV = 18%), These data highlight the urgent need for improvement in overall quality of andrology testing and indicate that practical proficiency testing programmes can be made available on a large scale.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 686
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Adelman MM, 1989, ATLAS SPERM MORPHOLO
[2]  
AGARWAL A, 1992, ANDROLOGIA, V24, P327
[3]  
AYODEJI O, 1986, FERTIL STERIL, V45, P839
[4]   SEMEN EVALUATIONS IN THE CLINICAL LABORATORY - HOW WELL ARE THEY BEING PERFORMED [J].
BAKER, DJ ;
PATERSON, MA ;
KLAASEN, JM ;
WYRICKGLATZEL, J .
LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1994, 25 (08) :509-514
[5]   Intra- and inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of sperm morphology by strict criteria: impact of semen preparation, staining techniques and manual versus computerized analysis [J].
Barroso, G ;
Mercan, R ;
Ozgur, K ;
Morshedi, M ;
Kolm, P ;
Coetzee, K ;
Kruger, T ;
Oehninger, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (08) :2036-2040
[6]  
BOONE DJ, 1992, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V116, P681
[7]  
BYRD W, 1992, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V116, P418
[8]  
CHONG AP, 1983, J ANDROL, V4, P280
[9]   DETECTION OF ANTISPERMATOZOAL ANTIBODIES OF IGA CLASS IN CERVICAL-MUCUS [J].
CLARKE, GN ;
STOJANOFF, A ;
CAUCHI, MN ;
MCBAIN, JC ;
SPEIRS, AL ;
JOHNSTON, WIH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 1984, 5 (02) :61-65
[10]   IMPLEMENTING COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY-CONTROL IN THE ANDROLOGY LABORATORY [J].
CLEMENTS, S ;
COOKE, ID ;
BARRATT, CLR .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (08) :2096-2106