Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography - A meta-analysis

被引:349
作者
Hamon, Michele
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G. L.
Malagutti, Patrizia
Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
Morello, Remy
Valgimigli, Marco
Hamon, Martial
机构
[1] CHU Caen, Serv Malad Coeur & Vaisseaux, Dept Radiol, F-14033 Caen, France
[2] CHU Caen, Dept Cardiol, F-14033 Caen, France
[3] CHU Caen, Dept Stat, F-14033 Caen, France
[4] Policlin San Donato, Hemodynam & Cardiovasc Radiol Serv, Milan, Italy
[5] Erasmus MC, Thoraxctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] AZ Middelheim, Cardiovasc Inst Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES This study was designed to define the current role of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) using a meta-analytic process. BACKGROUND Multislice spiral computed tomography has recently been proposed as an alternative to conventional coronary angiography (CA) for the diagnosis of CAD. METHODS Using Medline, we identified 29 studies (2,024 patients) evaluating CAD by means of both MSCT (16 slices) and conventional CA before July 2006. After data extraction the analysis was performed according to a random-effects model. RESULTS The per-segment analysis pooled the results from 27 studies corresponding to a cumulative number of 22,798 segments. Among unassessable segments, 4.2% were excluded from the analysis and 6.4% were classified at the discretion of the investigators, underscoring the shortcomings of MSCT. With this major limitation, the per-segment sensitivity and specificity were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72% to 89%) and 93% (95% CI 90% to 97%), respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 21.5 (95% CI 13.1 to 35.5) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.21), respectively, and positive and negative predictive values of 67.8% (95% CI 57.6% to 78.0%) and 96.5% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), respectively. As expected, the per-patient analysis has shown an increased sensitivity of 96% (95% CI 94% to 98%) but a decreased specificity of 74% (95% CI 65% to 84%). CONCLUSIONS Multislice spiral computed tomography has shortcomings difficult to overcome in daily practice and, at the more clinically relevant per-patient analysis, continues to have moderate specificity in patients with high prevalence of CAD. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of the newest generation of MSCT, including patients with low to moderate CAD prevalence, will be critical in establishing the clinical role of this emerging technology as an alternative to CA.
引用
收藏
页码:1896 / 1910
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures - Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Agostoni, P ;
Biondi-Zoccai, GGL ;
De Benedictis, ML ;
Rigattieri, S ;
Turri, M ;
Anselmi, M ;
Vassanelli, C ;
Zardini, P ;
Louvard, Y ;
Hamon, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) :349-356
[2]  
[Anonymous], 11 COCHR C BARC
[3]   Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures [J].
Betsou, S ;
Efstathopoulos, EP ;
Katritsis, D ;
Faulkner, K ;
Panayiotakis, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846) :634-639
[4]  
Cademartiri F, 2005, RADIOL MED, V109, P91
[5]   Non-invasive half millimetre 32 detector row computed tomography angiography accurately excludes significant stenoses in patients with advanced coronary artery disease and high calcium scores [J].
Cordeiro, MAS ;
Miller, JM ;
Schmidt, A ;
Lardo, AC ;
Rosen, BD ;
Bush, DE ;
Brinker, JA ;
Bluemke, DA ;
Shapiro, EP ;
Lima, JAC .
HEART, 2006, 92 (05) :589-597
[6]  
DEFEYTER PJ, 2005, COMPUT TOMOGR, P1
[7]   Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography [J].
Detrano, R ;
Hsiai, T ;
Wang, SJ ;
Puentes, G ;
Fallavollita, J ;
Shields, P ;
Stanford, W ;
Wolfkiel, C ;
Georgiou, D ;
Budoff, M ;
Reed, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 27 (02) :285-290
[8]   Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines [J].
Devillé W.L. ;
Buntinx F. ;
Bouter L.M. ;
Montori V.M. ;
De Vet H.C.W. ;
Van Der Windt D.A.W.M. ;
Bezemer P.D. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-13
[9]   Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population - Comparison with conventional invasive angiography [J].
Ehara, M ;
Surmely, JF ;
Kawai, M ;
Katoh, O ;
Matsubara, T ;
Terashima, M ;
Tsuchikane, E ;
Kinoshita, Y ;
Suzuki, T ;
Ito, T ;
Takeda, Y ;
Nasu, K ;
Tanaka, N ;
Murata, A ;
Suzuki, Y ;
Sato, K ;
Suzuki, T .
CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2006, 70 (05) :564-571
[10]   Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis [J].
Garcia, Mario J. ;
Lessick, Jonathan ;
Hoffmann, Martin H. K. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (04) :403-411