Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular axillary plexus block

被引:114
作者
Sites, B. D.
Beach, M. L.
Spence, B. C.
Wiley, C. W.
Shiffrin, J.
Hartman, G. S.
Gallagher, J. D.
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Dartmouth Med Sch, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Dartmouth Med Sch, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
关键词
axillary block; ultrasound; upper extremity; brachial plexus;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01042.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Traditional approaches to performing brachial plexus blocks via the axillary approach have varying success rates. The main objective of this study was to evaluate if a specific technique of ultrasound guidance could improve the success of axillary blocks in comparison to a two injection transarterial technique. Methods: Fifty-six ASA physical status I-III patients presenting for elective hand surgery were prospectively randomized to receive an axillary block performed by either a transarterial technique (Group TA) or an ultrasound-guided perivascular approach (Group US). Both groups received a total of 30 ml of 1.5% lidocaine (225 mg) with 5 mu g/ml epinephrine. Patients were then evaluated for block onset in specific nerve distributions and whether or not the block acted as a surgical anesthetic. Results: Group TA sustained more failures defined as conversion to general anesthesia or the inability to localize the artery [Group TA eight patients (29%) vs. Group US in which 0 patients required conversion to general anesthesia (0%) P < 0.01]. Group US demonstrated a reduction in performance times vs. Group TA (7.9 +/- 3.9 min vs. 11.1 +/- 5.7 min, P < 0.05). By 30 min post-injection, there were no significant differences between groups TA and US in terms of the proportion of patients demonstrating a complete motor or sensory loss. Conclusion: Ultrasonographic guidance improves the overall success rate of axillary blocks in comparison to a transarterial technique.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 684
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Effect of transarterial axillary block versus general anesthesia on paresthesiae 1 year after hand surgery [J].
Brull, R ;
McCartney, CJL ;
Chan, VWS ;
Abbas, S ;
Nova, H ;
von Schroeder, H ;
Katz, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 103 (05) :1104-1105
[2]   Nerve localization - Seek but not so easy to find? [J].
Chan, VWS .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (03) :245-248
[3]   Training of residents in peripheral nerve blocks during anesthesiology residency [J].
Chelly, JE ;
Greger, J ;
Gebhard, R ;
Hagberg, CA ;
Al-Samsam, T ;
Khan, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2002, 14 (08) :584-588
[4]   Location, location, location! Ultrasound imaging in regional anaesthesia [J].
Denny, NA ;
Harrop-Griffiths, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 94 (01) :1-3
[5]  
English Lorraine A, 2004, AANA J, V72, P57
[6]   A COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS OF AXILLARY APPROACH TO BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCKADE FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY [J].
GOLDBERG, ME ;
GREGG, C ;
LARIJANI, GE ;
NORRIS, MC ;
MARR, AT ;
SELTZER, JL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 66 (06) :814-816
[7]   Comparison of transarterial and multiple nerve stimulation techniques for an initial axillary block by 45 mL of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline [J].
Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ ;
Hesselbjerg, L ;
Fejlberg, V .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (05) :570-575
[8]   Comparison of transarterial and multiple nerve stimulation techniques for axillary block using a high dose of mepivacaine with adrenaline [J].
Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ ;
Nielsen, PR ;
Nielsen, SL ;
Gardi, T ;
Hermann, C .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 43 (04) :398-404
[9]   Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia [J].
Marhofer, P ;
Greher, M ;
Kapral, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 94 (01) :7-17
[10]   Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: An alternative technique to anatomical landmark-guided approaches [J].
Ootaki, C ;
Hayashi, H ;
Amano, M .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2000, 25 (06) :600-604