Toward progressive inclusion and acceptance: Myth or reality? The inclusion debate and bandwagon discourse

被引:85
作者
DePauw, KP [1 ]
Doll-Tepper, G
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Grad Sch, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Sport Sci, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1123/apaq.17.2.135
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
inclusion has been a topic of discussions and debate among adapted physical activity professionals since the 1980s. Although the initial discussions focused primarily on inclusion as a place or placement, the discourse today about inclusion must be expanded to incorporate issues of context, disability rights, and social justice. Inclusion must now be reconceptualized as an attitude or a process. Progressive inclusion and acceptance is not a myth but a reality. As international attention and efforts are focused on physical education as a right of all children, APA professionals must forego bandwagons and adopt a strong philosophical stance that guides our efforts toward achieving inclusive physical education.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 143
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1952, J HLTH PHYS ED RECRE
[2]  
BEAVER D, 1999, PALAESTRA, V15, P31
[3]   REALISTS, RADICALS, AND RAINBOWS [J].
BENNETT, RS .
QUEST, 1995, 47 (01) :115-130
[4]  
Block M.E., 1999, PALAESTRA, V15, P30
[5]  
Block M.E., 1994, PALAESTRA, V10, P17
[6]  
BLOCK ME, 1999, PALAESTRA, V15, P55
[7]  
CONDELUCI A, 1996, BEYOND DIFFERENCE
[8]  
CRAFT D, 1994, J PHYSICAL ED RECREA, V62, P54
[9]  
DATILLO J, 1994, INCLUSIVE LEISURE SE
[10]  
Davis LennardJ., 1995, ENFORCING NORMALCY D