Postnatal home visiting for illicit drug-using mothers and their infants: A randomised controlled trial

被引:35
作者
Bartu, Anne
Sharp, Jennifer
Ludlow, Joanne
Doherty, Dorota A.
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[2] King Edward Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Womens & Infants Hlth, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
breastfeeding; drugs; home visiting; immunisations; infant health;
D O I
10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00628.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Background: Postnatal home-visiting programs for illicit drug-using mothers have reported some success in reducing harms in some areas but there is a lack of data on their impact on breastfeeding and immunisation rates. Aims: To investigate the effect on breastfeeding, immunisation and parental drug use. The hypothesis was that the outcomes of the home-visiting group (HVG) would be superior to the control group (CG). Method: One hundred and fifty-two illicit drug-using women were recruited at 35-40 weeks gestation from King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia and randomised after delivery to the HVG or the CG. The HVG had eight home visits; the CG had telephone contact at two months and a home visit at six months. The HVG received education and support for parenting, breastfeeding and child development. This was not provided by the research midwives for the CG. Results: The main drugs were heroin, amphetamines, cannabis and benzodiazepines. Immunisation rates were similar for each group. Median duration of breastfeeding for the HVG was eight weeks (95% CI, 3.8-12.2); for the CG ten weeks (95% CI, 7.3-12.7). Drug use was reduced during pregnancy but increased by six months post-partum in both groups. The retention rates were: HVG 93%; CG 86%. Conclusion: The hypothesis for this study was not supported. Long-term studies are urgently required to assess the effects of parental drug use on infant and child development.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 426
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Batey R G, 1993, Drug Alcohol Rev, V12, P265, DOI 10.1080/09595239300185311
[2]
Spectrum of early intervention services for children with intrauterine drug exposure [J].
Belcher, HME ;
Butz, AM ;
Wallace, P ;
Hoon, AH ;
Reinhardt, E ;
Reeves, SA ;
Pulsifer, MB .
INFANTS & YOUNG CHILDREN, 2005, 18 (01) :2-15
[3]
Effectiveness of a home intervention for perceived child behavioral problems and parenting stress in children with in utero drug exposure [J].
Butz, AM ;
Pulsifer, M ;
Marano, N ;
Belcher, H ;
Lears, MK ;
Royall, R .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2001, 155 (09) :1029-1037
[4]
An experimental intervention with families of substance abusers: one-year follow-up of the focus on families project [J].
Catalano, RF ;
Gainey, RR ;
Fleming, CB ;
Haggerty, KP ;
Johnson, NO .
ADDICTION, 1999, 94 (02) :241-254
[5]
Parent training skills and methadone maintenance: clinical opportunities and challenges [J].
Dawe, S ;
Harnett, PH ;
Staiger, P ;
Dadds, MR .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2000, 60 (01) :1-11
[6]
Home visits during pregnancy and after birth for women with an alcohol or drug problem [J].
Doggett, C. ;
Burrett, S. ;
Osborn, D. A. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (04)
[7]
Fares I, 1997, J Perinatol, V17, P179
[8]
GOSSOP M, 1995, ADDICTION, V90, P607, DOI 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9056072.x
[9]
Hulse GK, 1997, ADDICTION, V92, P1561
[10]
National Health and Medical Research Council, 2003, DIET GUID CHILDR AD