Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer

被引:334
作者
Brenner, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Ctr Radiol Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
cancer screening; computed tomography (CT); radiation exposure; lung; effects of irradiation on; special reports;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2312030880
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To estimate the radiation-related lung cancer risks associated with annual low-dose computed tomographic (CT) lung screening in adult smokers and former smokers, and to establish a baseline risk that the potential benefits of such screening should exceed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The estimated lung radiation dose from low-dose CT lung examinations corresponds to a dose range for which there is direct evidence of increased cancer risk in atomic bomb survivors. Estimated dose-, sex-, and smoking status-dependent excess relative risks of lung cancer were derived from cancer incidence data for atomic bomb survivors and used to calculate the excess lung cancer risks associated with a single CT lung examination at a given age in a U.S. population. From these, the overall radiation risks associated with annual CT lung screening were estimated. RESULTS: A 50-year-old female smoker who undergoes annual CT lung screening until age 75 would incur an estimated radiation-related lung cancer risk of 0.85%, in addition to her otherwise expected lung cancer risk of approximately 17%. The radiation-associated cancer risk to other organs would be far lower. If 50% of all current and former smokers in the U.S. population aged 50-75 years received annual CT screening, the estimated number of lung cancers associated with radiation from screening would be approximately 36,000, a 1.8% (95% credibility interval: 0.5%, 5.5%) increase over the otherwise expected number. CONCLUSION: Given the estimated upper limit of a 5.5% increase in lung cancer risk attributable to annual CT-related radiation exposure, a mortality benefit of considerably more than 5% may be necessary to outweigh the potential radiation risks. (C) RSNA, 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 445
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A consensus statement of the society of thoracic radiology - Screening for lung cancer with helical computed tomography
    Aberle, DR
    Gamsu, G
    Henschke, CI
    Naidich, DP
    Swensen, SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2001, 16 (01) : 65 - 68
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, REPORT GEN ASSEMBLY
  • [3] Arias Elizabeth, 2002, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V51, P1
  • [4] Screening for lung cancer - The guidelines
    Bach, PB
    Niewoehner, DE
    Black, WC
    [J]. CHEST, 2003, 123 (01) : 83S - 88S
  • [5] Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation?
    Brenner, DJ
    Sawant, SG
    Hande, MP
    Miller, RC
    Elliston, CD
    Fu, Z
    Randers-Pehrson, G
    Marino, SA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 78 (12) : 1065 - 1067
  • [6] Effects of smoking and radiotherapy on lung carcinoma in breast carcinoma survivors
    Ford, MB
    Sigurdson, AJ
    Petrulis, ES
    Ng, CS
    Kemp, B
    Cooksley, C
    McNeese, M
    Selwyn, BJ
    Spitz, MR
    Bondy, ML
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 98 (07) : 1457 - 1464
  • [7] Randomized controlled trial with low-dose spiral CT for lung cancer screening: Feasibility study and preliminary results
    Garg, K
    Keith, RL
    Byers, T
    Kelly, K
    Kerzner, AL
    Lynch, DA
    Miller, YE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (02) : 506 - 510
  • [8] Gilbert ES, 2003, RADIAT RES, V159, P161, DOI 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0161:LCATFH]2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Henschke CI, 2002, CANCER J, V8, pS47