The efficacy of a mind-body-spirit group for women with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial

被引:102
作者
Targ, EF [1 ]
Levine, EG [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif Pacific Med Ctr, Complementary Med Res Inst, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
关键词
breast cancer support; complementary and alternative medicine; spirituality; group therapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0163-8343(02)00191-3
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Increasing numbers of women with breast cancer are seeking alternatives to standard group support in coping with their illness. This study examines outcomes for 181 women with breast cancer randomized to either a 12-week standard group Support or a 12-week complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) support intervention. Participants in the CAM group were taught the use of meditation, affirmation, imagery and ritual. The standard group combined cognitive-behavioral approaches with group sharing and support. Both interventions were found to be associated with improved quality of life (CAM, P=0.008; Standard, P=0.006). decreased depression (CAM. P=0.004: Standard, P=0.02), decreased anxiety (CAM, P=0.0003: Standard. P=0.02) and increased "spiritual well-being" (CAM, P=002: Standard, P=0.003). Only the CAM Group showed increases in measures of Spiritual Integration (P=0.001) which were also significant between groups (P=0.003). The Standard group was associated with decreased confusion (P=0.01) and decreased helplessness/hopelessness (P=0.01), while the CAM group was associated with decreased avoidance (P=0.01). None of these latter changes were significant between groups. At baseline, very hi,,h correlations were noted between measures of quality of life, mood. and spiritual integration. At the end of the intervention, the CAM group showed higher satisfaction (P=0.006) and fewer dropouts (P=0.006) compared to the standard group. Better outcomes in quality of life in the CAM Group were associated with lower initial fighting spirit (r=-.39, P=0.001). No baseline factors predicted better outcomes in the Standard group. In summary. the study found equivalence on most psychosocial Outcomes between the two interventions. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 248
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC CAL D, 2000, CANC FACTS FIG
[2]   Why patients use alternative medicine - Results of a national study [J].
Astin, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (19) :1548-1553
[3]  
Brady MJ, 1999, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V8, P417, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199909/10)8:5<417::AID-PON398>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-W
[5]   EFFECTIVENESS OF BIOFEEDBACK AND RELAXATION TRAINING IN REDUCING THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BURISH, TG ;
JENKINS, RA .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 11 (01) :17-23
[6]   PREPARING PATIENTS FOR CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY - EFFECT OF COPING PREPARATION AND RELAXATION INTERVENTIONS [J].
BURISH, TG ;
SNYDER, SL ;
JENKINS, RA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (04) :518-525
[7]  
Busick B S, 1989, Hosp J, V5, P67, DOI 10.1300/J011v05n02_06
[8]  
CASSILETH BR, 1994, ANN INTERN MED, V101, P105
[9]  
Cella D, 1997, MANUAL FUNCTIONAL AS
[10]  
Cotton SP, 1999, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V8, P429, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199909/10)8:5<429::AID-PON420>3.0.CO