Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management-A question of roles and power: Lessons from England

被引:100
作者
Thaler, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Leuin-Keitel, Meike [3 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, Flood Hazard Res Ctr, London N17 8HR, England
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Mt Risk Engn, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[3] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Planning, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Stakeholder engagement; Flood risk management; Power; Partnership funding; Societal implications; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SOFT SPACES; GOVERNANCE; PARTICIPATION; PERSPECTIVES; BARRIERS; INSIGHTS; GERMANY; LOOKING; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the past years, stakeholder engagement has become more important in flood risk management. On the one hand stakeholder engagement is often declared as a better way of management, a more successful way to reach consensus in policy discussions. On the other hand is the implementation of increasing stakeholder engagement far away from being as positive, where stakeholder engagement often ends in diverse difficulties and conflicts between political leaders and stakeholder groups. This paper aims to highlight participatory governance in flood risk management to provide an overview of the potential contributions and challenges of a participatory and collaborative governance approach. In this paper, we discuss the role of national authorities and local stakeholders in English flood risk management in three different examples (Bridgwater, Cockermouth and Morpeth). The results show that the Cockermouth and Morpeth flood risk management scheme is characterised by a high level of local self-responsibility in the planning and decision-making process. The study sites with high local capacity (Cockermouth and Morpeth) show a strong leadership at local level and bottom-up concepts and ideas. The local involvement in the discussion and decision-process depends on the local capacity (capacity to act), such as resources (knowledge, financial, time), interest, social and cultural capital. It strongly depends on these aspects, if localities are able to ensure their interests and needs at national level. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 301
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Allen J., 2009, Journal of Power, V2, P197, DOI [10.1080/17540290903064267, DOI 10.1080/17540290903064267, https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290903064267]
  • [2] Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway
    Allmendinger, Phil
    Haughton, Graham
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2009, 41 (03): : 617 - 633
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
  • [4] Blackstock K., 2014, AREA
  • [5] Bues A., 2012, Water Alternatives, V5, P266
  • [6] Reform on the Frontline: Reflections on Implementing Spatial Planning in England, 2004-2008
    Clifford, Ben
    [J]. PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2013, 28 (04) : 361 - 383
  • [7] The Hull floods of 2007: implications for the governance and management of urban drainage systems
    Coulthard, T. J.
    Frostick, L. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2010, 3 (03): : 223 - 231
  • [8] Territory, Scale, and Why Capitalism Matters
    Cox, Kevin R.
    [J]. TERRITORY POLITICS GOVERNANCE, 2013, 1 (01) : 46 - 61
  • [9] Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics
    Cox, KR
    [J]. POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1998, 17 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [10] Towards a Conceptual Framework for The Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance - Experiences From The Netherlands
    Driessen, Peter P. J.
    Dieperink, Carel
    van Laerhoven, Frank
    Runhaar, Hens A. C.
    Vermeulen, Walter J. V.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2012, 22 (03) : 143 - 160