Medium-dose ultraviolet (UV) A1 vs. narrowband UVB phototherapy in atopic eczema: a randomized crossover study

被引:75
作者
Gambichler, T. [1 ]
Othlinghaus, N. [1 ]
Tomi, N. S. [1 ]
Holland-Letz, T. [2 ]
Boms, S. [1 ]
Skrygan, M. [1 ]
Altmeyer, P. [1 ]
Kreuter, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Dermatol, D-44791 Bochum, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
关键词
atopic dermatitis; narrowband UVB; phototherapy; UVA1; radiation; MESSENGER-RNA EXPRESSION; DERMATITIS; SKIN; CHILDREN; THERAPY; PARAMETERS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08984.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Ultraviolet (UV) A1 and narrowband (NB)-UVB have been reported to be effective treatments for atopic eczema (AE). We aimed to compare the efficacy of medium-dose UVA1 and NB-UVB mono-phototherapy in patients with AE. A randomized double-blind controlled crossover trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00419406) was conducted in which patients with AE received a 6-week course of both medium-dose UVA1 and NB-UVB. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the Six Area, Six Sign, Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD) score and a visual analogue scale for pruritus. Assessment of health-related quality of life was performed using the Skindex-29. Total immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were evaluated at baseline and after each phototherapy course. Twenty-eight patients who completed both UVA1 and NB-UVB phototherapy courses on an intention-to-treat basis were analysed according to the crossover design. Both interventions were associated with significant clinical improvement but there was no significant difference between treatments with respect to the mean +/- SD relative reduction (RR) of the clinical scores (SASSAD, 43.7 +/- 31.4% vs. 39.4 +/- 24.1%, P = 0.5; pruritus score, 16 +/- 61.8% vs. 25.2 +/- 30.5%, P = 0.5, respectively). There was no significant difference in the mean +/- SD RR of the Skindex-29 after UVA1 and NB-UVB phototherapy (12.7 +/- 18.8% vs. 16.5 +/- 17.6%, P = 0.1). Changes in the total IgE and ECP levels following UVA1 and NB-UVB did not differ significantly (P = 0.3 and P = 0.9, respectively). A 6-week course of NB-UVB and UVA1 phototherapy of AE resulted in significant clinical improvement. With regard to efficacy and tolerability, both phototherapeutic modalities may be considered comparably good.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 658
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Long-term efficacy of medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy in atopic dermatitis [J].
Abeck, D ;
Schmidt, T ;
Fesq, H ;
Strom, K ;
Mempel, M ;
Brockow, K ;
Ring, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 42 (02) :254-257
[2]  
Abramovits W, 2005, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V53, pS86, DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.034
[3]   German adaptation of the Skindex-29 questionnaire on quality of life in dermatology:: Validation and clinical results [J].
Augustin, M ;
Wenninger, K ;
Amon, U ;
Schroth, MJ ;
Küster, W ;
Chren, M ;
Kupfer, J ;
Gieler, U .
DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 209 (01) :14-20
[4]   The role of ultraviolet irradiation in malignant melanoma [J].
Berking C. .
Der Hautarzt, 2005, 56 (7) :687-697
[6]   Phototherapy in the management of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review [J].
Bhavani Meduri, N. ;
Vandergriff, Travis ;
Rasmussen, Heather ;
Jacobe, Heidi .
PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 2007, 23 (04) :106-112
[7]   Ultraviolet A1 phototherapy [J].
Dawe, RS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 148 (04) :626-637
[8]   Photocarcinogenesis: UVA vs. UVB radiation [J].
de Gruijl, FR .
SKIN PHARMACOLOGY AND APPLIED SKIN PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 15 (05) :316-320
[9]   Half-side comparison study on the efficacy of 8-methoxypsoralen bath-PUVA versus narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy in patients with severe chronic atopic dermatitis [J].
Der-Petrossian, M ;
Seeber, A ;
Hönigsmann, H ;
Tanew, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 142 (01) :39-43
[10]   The challenge of follow-up in narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy [J].
Diffey, B. L. ;
Farr, P. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 157 (02) :344-349