Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients - A randomized crossover study

被引:232
作者
Werner, C
von Frankenberg, S
Treig, T
Konrad, M
Hesse, S
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Klin Berlin, Dept Neurol Rehabil, D-14089 Berlin, Germany
[2] Neurol Rehabil Ctr, Greifswald, Germany
关键词
exercise therapy; gait; paresis; rehabilitation; stroke;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.0000035734.61539.f6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-The purpose of this study was to compare treadmill and electromechanical gait trainer therapy in subacute, nonambulatory stroke survivors. The gait trainer was designed to provide nonambulatory subjects the repetitive practice of a gait-like movement without overexerting therapists. Methods-This was a randomized, controlled study with a crossover design following an A-B-A versus a B-A-B pattern. A consisted of 2 weeks of gait trainer therapy, and B consisted of 2 weeks of treadmill therapy. Thirty nonambulatory hemiparetic patients, 4 to 12 weeks after stroke, were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups receiving locomotor therapy every workday for 15 to 20 minutes for 6 weeks. Weekly gait ability (functional ambulation category [FAC]), gait velocity, and the required physical assistance during both kinds of locomotor therapy were the primary outcome measures, and other motor functions (Rivermead motor assessment score) and ankle spasticity (modified Ashworth score) were the secondary outcome measures. Follow-up occurred 6 months later. Results-The groups did not differ at study onset with respect to the clinical characteristics and effector variables. During treatment, the FAC, gait velocity, and Rivermead scores improved in both groups, and ankle spasticity did not change. Median FAC level was 4 (3 to 4) in group A compared with 3 (2 to 3) in group B at the end of treatment (P=0.018), but the difference at 6-month follow up was not significant. The therapeutic effort was less on the gait trainer, with I instead of 2 therapists assisting the patient at study onset. All but seven patients preferred the gait trainer. Conclusions-The newly developed gait trainer was at least as effective as treadmill therapy with partial body weight support while requiring less input from the therapist. Further studies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:2895 / 2901
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, CONCEPTS NEUROSCIENC
[2]   ENHANCEMENT OF LOCOMOTOR RECOVERY FOLLOWING SPINAL-CORD INJURY [J].
BARBEAU, H ;
ROSSIGNOL, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 1994, 7 (06) :517-524
[3]  
Carr JH, 1998, NEUROLOGICAL REHABIL
[4]  
da Cunha IT, 2001, J REHABIL RES DEV, V38, P245
[5]   LOCOMOTOR-ACTIVITY IN SPINAL MAN [J].
DIETZ, V ;
COLOMBO, G ;
JENSEN, L .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8932) :1260-1263
[6]   An overview of treadmill locomotor training with partial body weight support: A neurophysiologically sound approach whose time has come for randomized clinical trials [J].
Dobkin, BH .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 1999, 13 (03) :157-165
[7]   An electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in hemiparetic stroke patients: Preliminary results [J].
Hesse, S ;
Werner, C ;
Uhlenbrock, D ;
Von Frankenberg, S ;
Bardeleben, A ;
Brandl-Hesse, B .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2001, 15 (01) :39-50
[8]   Development of an advanced mechanised gait trainer, controlling movement of the centre of mass, for restoring gait in non-ambulant subjects [J].
Hesse, S ;
Sarkodie-Gyan, T ;
Uhlenbrock, D .
BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 1999, 44 (7-8) :194-201
[9]   Influence of walking speed on lower limb muscle activity and energy consumption during treadmill walking of hemiparetic patients [J].
Hesse, S ;
Werner, C ;
Paul, T ;
Bardeleben, A ;
Chaler, J .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (11) :1547-1550
[10]   RESTORATION OF GAIT IN NONAMBULATORY HEMIPARETIC PATIENTS BY TREADMILL TRAINING WITH PARTIAL BODY-WEIGHT SUPPORT [J].
HESSE, S ;
BERTELT, C ;
SCHAFFRIN, A ;
MALEZIC, M ;
MAURITZ, KH .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (10) :1087-1093