Exploring barriers to long-term follow-up in newborn screening programs

被引:26
作者
Hoff, Timothy
Hoyt, Adrienne
Therrell, Brad
Ayoob, Maria
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Behav, Rensselaer, NY 12144 USA
[2] Natl Newborn Screening & Genet Resource Ctr, Austin, TX USA
关键词
newborn screening; long-term follow-up; state policy; public health;
D O I
10.1097/01.gim.0000237790.54074.3d
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 [遗传学]; 090102 [作物遗传育种];
摘要
Purpose: To inform current policy debate regarding the public health role in long-term follow-up for individuals with disorders identified through state newborn testing efforts, by identifying and assessing key challenges, quality assurance activities, and long-term follow-up perceptions of state newborn screening programs. Methods: A 23-question, web-based survey sent to newborn screening programs in all 50 states and Washington, DC, during January and February, 2005. Results: Many U.S. newborn screening programs do not currently engage in structured long-term follow-up for newborns with diagnosed disorders. The newborn screening programs that do long-term follow-up face various challenges that may impact their ability to perform it effectively. Barriers include a lack of comprehensive quality assurance practices, outsourcing, financial constraints, and perceived communication problems with providers who treat these patients. Conclusions: A more in-depth analysis of the desired and feasible roles that should be played by newborn screening programs in long-term follow-up is needed. The wide variability within programs regarding the structure and implementation of long-term follow-up, and the relative absence of long-term follow-up systems components in some newborn screening programs, poses an interesting question regarding responsibility for evaluation of longer-term outcomes associated with newborn testing and disorder diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 570
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2000, Pediatrics, V106, P383
[2]
CLAYTON EW, 1992, PEDIATRICS, V90, P641
[3]
*CLIN LAB STAND I, 2005, NEWB SCREEN FOLL UP
[4]
Cohen J., 1983, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, DOI [10.1002/0471264385.wei0219, DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI0219]
[5]
DODD CJ, 2005, NEWBORN SCREENING CH
[6]
Quality systems in health care: a sociotechnical approach [J].
Harteloh, PPM .
HEALTH POLICY, 2003, 64 (03) :391-398
[7]
The perceived impact of privatization on local health departments [J].
Keane, C ;
Marx, J ;
Ricci, E ;
Barron, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (07) :1178-1180
[8]
Examination of the communication practices between state newborn screening programs and the medical home [J].
Kim, S ;
Lloyd-Puryear, MA ;
Tonniges, TF .
PEDIATRICS, 2003, 111 (02) :E120-126
[9]
Newborn screening program practices in the United States: Notification, research, and consent [J].
Mandl, KD ;
Feit, S ;
Larson, C ;
Kohane, IS .
PEDIATRICS, 2002, 109 (02) :269-273
[10]
*MAT CHILD HLTH BU, 2004, NEWB SCREEN UN SCREE