Epidural Cortical Stimulation as Adjunctive Treatment for Nonfluent Aphasia: Phase 1 Clinical Trial Follow-up Findings

被引:10
作者
Cherney, Leora R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Ctr Aphasia Res & Treatment, 345 East Super St,Suite 1353, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
aphasia; brain stimulation; epidural; rehabilitation; stroke; CHRONIC POSTSTROKE APHASIA; MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; STROKE; RECOVERY; RELIABILITY; FEASIBILITY; PLASTICITY; VALIDITY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1177/1545968315622574
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Background. There is increasing interest in the application of cortical stimulation (CS) as an adjuvant strategy in aphasia rehabilitation. Epidural CS, although more invasive than other methods, can provide high-frequency ipsilesional stimulation with greater spatial specificity. Objective. We review methods and results of a phase 1 study of epidural CS in combination with rehabilitation therapy in aphasia and provide new objective and self-report data collected between 6 and 21 months after the end of treatment. Methods. Eight stroke survivors with nonfluent aphasia received intensive language therapy, 3 hours a day, for 6 weeks. Four participants also underwent surgical implantation of an epidural stimulation device that was activated only during therapy sessions. Behavioral data were collected before treatment, at the end of treatment, and at 6 and 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Of the 8 participants, 7 also participated in the longer-term follow-up visit. Results. Changes in objective scores from baseline were larger in investigational participants than controls at all assessments, including the longer-term follow-up visit. Satisfaction ratings and ratings of overall improvement by investigational participants and their companions were more varied than those of the controls, but all indicated that they would recommend the investigational treatment to others with aphasia. Conclusions. Improvements were generally maintained for at least 12 weeks posttreatment and possibly as long as 21 months posttreatment. Epidural CS is a potentially safe, feasible adjunctive intervention for persons with chronic nonfluent aphasia that spares the ventral premotor cortex and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 142
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: Enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats [J].
Adkins-Muir, DL ;
Jones, TA .
NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 25 (08) :780-788
[2]
Therapeutic Interventions for Aphasia Initiated More than Six Months Post Stroke: A Review of the Evidence [J].
Allen, Laura ;
Mehta, Swati ;
McClure, J. Andrew ;
Teasell, Robert .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2012, 19 (06) :523-535
[3]
[Anonymous], 2001, Boston naming test
[4]
Epidural Cortical Stimulation as a Treatment for Poststroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms [J].
Balossier, Anne ;
Etard, Olivier ;
Descat, Chloe ;
Vivien, Denis ;
Emery, Evelyne .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2016, 30 (02) :120-130
[5]
Epidural electrical stimulation for the treatment of chronic poststroke aphasia: still compulsory 6 years later! [J].
Balossier, Anne ;
Etard, Olivier ;
Descat, Chloe ;
Vivien, Denis ;
Emery, Evelyne .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 27 (02) :246-248
[6]
Epidural electrical stimulation to improve chronic poststroke aphasia: A 5-year follow-up [J].
Balossier, Anne ;
Etard, Olivier ;
Descat, Chloe ;
Vivien, Denis ;
Emery, Evelyne .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) :364-368
[7]
Brady MC, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub3]
[8]
Brown JA, 2008, NEUROSURGERY, V62, P853, DOI [10.1227/01.NEU.0000197100.63931.04, 10.1227/01.neu.0000316287.37618.78]
[9]
Effects of bilateral extradural cortical stimulation for plegic stroke rehabilitation [J].
Canavero, S ;
Bonicalzi, V ;
Intonti, S ;
Crasto, S ;
Castellano, G .
NEUROMODULATION, 2006, 9 (01) :28-33
[10]
Cherney L.R., 2008, LANGUAGE INTERVENTIO, P186