Artifacts in MRI of the temporomandibular joint caused by dental alloys: A phantom study at 1.5 T

被引:14
作者
Fellner, C
Behr, M
Fellner, F
Held, P
Handel, G
Feuerbach, S
机构
[1] KLINIKUM UNIV REGENSBURG, INST RONTGENDIAGNOST, REGENSBURG, GERMANY
[2] KLINIKUM UNIV REGENSBURG, POLIKLIN ZAHNARZTLICHE PROTHET, REGENSBURG, GERMANY
[3] UNIV ERLANGEN NURNBERG, INST DIAGNOST RADIOL, D-8520 ERLANGEN, GERMANY
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 1997年 / 166卷 / 05期
关键词
MR; artifacts; dental alloys; temporomandibular joint (TMJ);
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1015452
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The influence of dental alloys on MRI of the temporomandibular joint was studied using a phantom model for this joint. Methods: At 1.5 T, 15 dental alloys and 14 of their most important components were investigated acquiring sagittal (FOV: 150 mm) and transverse (FOV: 250 mm) T-1-weighted SE images. In 11 cases, T-1- and T-2*-weighted FLASH images were measured additionally. The artifacts were assessed qualitatively as well as quantitatively, and the samples were subdivided into four artifact categories. Results: Ag, Cu, Ca, In, Ti, Sn, Zn, amalgam, the precious alloys, the Au-Pd and Ag-Pd alloys showed no artifacts (category I). Minimal artifacts below 10 mm on transverse images (category II) were found for Cr, Pd, Pt and for the Ni-Cr alloy. Mn and the remaining non-precious alloys induced artifacts up to 30 mm (category III). Significant artifacts - more than 30 mm - (category IV) were caused by Ni-Cr and 18/8 wires and by Co, Fe, and Ni. T-2*-weighted FLASH proved to be more susceptible for artifacts than T-1-weighted SE and FLASH techniques. Conclusions: In contrast to dental alloys for fixed prosthodontics, Ni-Cr- or 18/8 wires used for orthodontic bands can influence not only the image quality, but also the diagnostic reliability of MRI of the temporomandibular joint.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 428
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ALANEN A, 1995, ACTA RADIOL, V36, P92
[2]   MR IMAGING OF LARGE NONFERROMAGNETIC METALLIC IMPLANTS AT 1.5-T [J].
AUGUSTINY, N ;
VONSCHULTHESS, GK ;
MEIER, D ;
BOSIGER, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1987, 11 (04) :678-683
[3]  
Behr M, 1996, Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, V4, P111
[4]   CORRELATION BETWEEN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING DISTURBANCES AND THE MAGNETIC-SUSCEPTIBILITY OF DENTAL MATERIALS [J].
BEUF, O ;
LISSAC, M ;
CREMILLIEUX, Y ;
BRIGUET, A .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1994, 10 (04) :265-268
[5]  
FACHE JS, 1987, AM J NEURORADIOL, V8, P837
[6]   VERSATILE AND SENSITIVE VIBRATING-SAMPLE MAGNETOMETER [J].
FONER, S .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1959, 30 (07) :548-557
[7]   Magnetic resonance of the disk of the temporomandibular joint - MR imaging protocol [J].
Held, P ;
Moritz, M ;
Fellner, C ;
Behr, M ;
Gmeinwieser, J .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 1996, 20 (03) :204-211
[8]   DENTAL MATERIAL ARTIFACTS ON MR IMAGES [J].
HINSHAW, DB ;
HOLSHOUSER, BA ;
ENGSTROM, HIM ;
TJAN, AHL ;
CHRISTIANSEN, EL ;
CATELLI, WF .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (03) :777-779
[9]   DENTAL MATERIALS AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
LISSAC, M ;
METROP, D ;
BRUGIRARD, J ;
COUDERT, JL ;
PIMMEL, P ;
BRIGUET, A ;
REVEL, D ;
AMIEL, M .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1991, 26 (01) :40-45
[10]   RISKS AND ARTIFACTS DURING MRT (1.5 TESLA) DUE TO METALLIC FOREIGN-BODIES - EXAMINATIONS ON PHANTOMS AND ON 60 PATIENTS [J].
MAAS, R ;
KOOIJMAN, H ;
HELLER, M ;
LANGKOWSKI, HJ ;
GRABBE, E ;
BUCHELER, E .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1987, 147 (04) :365-374