A quality assurance review of outpatient care of children with life-threatening asthma exacerbations

Objectives: A hospital admission for asthma represents an opportunity to address and improve asthma control. The aims of this study were to compare the ambulatory care of children admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) following a life-threatening asthma exacerbation with published guidelines of asthma management and to identify areas that could be targeted for change. Methods: A retrospective review of case notes of children admitted to the ICU with asthma over a 6-month period. Variables recorded were: demographic; asthma history (including prior pattern of asthma, hospital admissions, interval treatment and managing doctor); admission details (consultation of respiratory team and asthma educator); and discharge management. Results: There were 40 admissions of 38 children (24 males) with mean age 5.7 years (range 1.1-14 years). The majority (58%) had previous admissions for asthma (55 admissions in 22 children), with 23% of these to ICU. Sixty three per cent of those with previous admissions had persistent asthma, but only 29% were on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). Most (60%) were managed by their local medical officer (LMO). Use of ICS was more likely if managed by a paediatrician. A respiratory subspecialist was consulted in 42% and the asthma educator in 70% of ICU admissions. Discharge medication included ICS in 74%, with no interval treatment in 18% of admissions. Follow up was by a respiratory subspecialist in 25% of cases. Conclusion: Asthma management before and after admission with life-threatening asthma did not conform to available guidelines. Persistent asthma was under-treated. Paediatricians were more likely to use interval treatment than LMO. We identified areas in which quality of care and outcome could be improved in this vulnerable group of asthmatics.