Screening for Down syndrome: changing practice of obstetricians

被引:56
作者
Driscoll, Deborah A. [1 ]
Morgan, Maria A. [2 ]
Schulkin, Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Amer Coll Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Dept Res, Washington, DC 20024 USA
关键词
Down syndrome; first-trimester screen; maternal serum screen; nuchal translucency; questionnaire; PRACTICE PATTERNS; 2ND TRIMESTER; KNOWLEDGE; 1ST; IMPLEMENTATION; 1ST-TRIMESTER; DISCLOSURE; PREGNANCY; SERUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the impact of American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines on the practices and knowledge of obstetricians regarding screening for Down syndrome 1 year later. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire on Down syndrome screening was mailed to 968 ACOG Fellows and Junior Fellows. RESULTS: The response rate was 53%. The majority (95%) of respondents offer Down syndrome screening to all pregnant patients; 70% of general obstetricians offer the first-trimester screen and 86% the quad screen. Almost two-thirds (63%) of respondents are offering patients >= 1 combination of first- and second-trimester screening tests. For women aged < 35 years, 70% offer amniocentesis selectively and 15% routinely. Chorionic villus sampling is offered less frequently. Respondents who more closely read the bulletin were more likely to say their practice had changed, answered more knowledge questions correctly, and felt more qualified to counsel patients. Most (85%) obstetricians personally counsel patients about Down syndrome risk and screening tests. The majority (94-95%) of respondents have access to adequate resources for screening within a 90-minute drive. CONCLUSION: Obstetricians have adopted a new paradigm for Down syndrome screening. First-trimester screening has been incorporated into prenatal care. Experience with these current screening tests will likely influence future guidelines and challenge the long-standing tradition of offering diagnostic testing based on maternal age. This study highlights the need for concise, unambiguous guidelines and a need to address unresolved issues in Down syndrome screening.
引用
收藏
页码:459.e1 / 459.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Obstetrics Gynecology, V109, P217
[2]   Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis [J].
Benn, PA ;
Egan, JFX ;
Fang, M ;
Smith-Bindman, R .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (06) :1255-1260
[3]   Cell-free fetal DNA and intact fetal cells in maternal blood circulation: implications for first and second trimester non-invasive prenatal diagnosis [J].
Bischoff, FZ ;
Sinacori, MK ;
Dang, DD ;
Marquez-Do, D ;
Horne, C ;
Lewis, DE ;
Simpson, JL .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2002, 8 (06) :493-500
[4]   Postterm pregnancy: Practice patterns of contemporary obstetricians and gynecologists [J].
Cleary-Goldman, J ;
Bettes, B ;
Robinson, JN ;
Norwitz, E ;
D'Alton, ME ;
Schulkin, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2006, 23 (01) :15-20
[5]   Screening for Down syndrome Practice patterns and knowledge of obstetricians and gynecologists [J].
Cleary-Goldman, J ;
Morgan, MA ;
Malone, FD ;
Robinson, JN ;
D'Alton, ME ;
Schulkin, J .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (01) :11-17
[6]   Multiple pregnancy: Knowledge and practice patterns of obstetricians and gynecologists [J].
Cleary-Goldman, J ;
Morgan, MA ;
Robinson, JN ;
D'Alton, ME ;
Schulkin, J .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (02) :232-237
[7]   Down syndrome screening in the first and/or second trimester: Model predicted performance using meta-analysis parameters [J].
Cuckle, H ;
Benn, P ;
Wright, D .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2005, 29 (04) :252-257
[8]   Practice trends in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology: Findings of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network, 1995-2000 [J].
Hill, LD ;
Erickson, K ;
Holzman, GB ;
Power, ML ;
Schulkin, J .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2001, 56 (08) :505-516
[9]   Integrated serum screening for Down syndrome in primary obstetric practice [J].
Knight, GJ ;
Palomaki, GE ;
Neveux, LM ;
Smith, DE ;
Kloza, EM ;
Pulkkinen, AJ ;
Williams, J ;
Haddow, JE .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (12) :1162-1167
[10]  
KRIEGER R, REGIONAL PRENATAL SC