Information aggregation and communication in committees

被引:32
作者
Austen-Smith, David [1 ]
Feddersen, Timothy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, MEDS Dept, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
information; communication; committees; UNANIMOUS JURY VERDICTS; DELIBERATION; INSTITUTIONS; THEOREM; RULES;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2008.0256
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this paper, we attempt to explain the underlying strategic incentives confronting individuals when they must make a collective decision over a set of alternatives and each has information that is decision-relevant for others. A significant literature has emerged in formal political theory over the past several years that focuses on such problems, paying particular attention, first, to the extent to which voting can be expected to aggregate committee members' information and, second, to the role of communication among committee members prior to voting. Inter alia, this literature reveals a surprisingly subtle interaction between the voting rules used to make decisions and the incentives for committee members to share information prior to voting.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 769
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRA
[2]  
Austen-Smith D, 2006, AM POLIT SCI REV, V100, P209
[3]  
AustenSmith D, 2005, STUD CHOICE WELF, P1, DOI 10.1007/b138884
[4]   INFORMATION-TRANSMISSION IN DEBATE [J].
AUSTENSMITH, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1990, 34 (01) :124-152
[5]   Information aggregation, rationality, and the condorcet jury theorem [J].
AustenSmith, D ;
Banks, JS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1996, 90 (01) :34-45
[6]   STRATEGIC MODELS OF TALK IN POLITICAL DECISION-MAKING [J].
AUSTENSMITH, D .
INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1992, 13 (01) :45-58
[7]  
AUSTENSMITH D, 2007, NOTE PREFERENCE UNCE
[8]  
BATTAGLINI M, REV EC STUD IN PRESS
[9]  
BATTAGLINI M, AM EC REV P IN PRESS
[10]  
BOHMANN J., 1997, Deliberative Democracy