Pain intensity assessment in older adults - Use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults

被引:401
作者
Herr, KA
Spratt, K
Mobily, PR
Richardson, G
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Iowa Testing Programs, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Iowa Spine Res Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
pain; assessment; measurement; aged; elderly; pain threshold;
D O I
10.1097/00002508-200407000-00002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
Objectives: To determine: (1) the psychometric properties and utility of 5 types of commonly used pain rating scales when used with younger and older adults, (2) factors related to failure to successfully use a pain rating scale, (3) pain rating scale preference, and (4) factors impacting scale preference. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used to gather data from a sample of 86 younger (age 25-55) and 89 older (age 65-94) adult volunteer subjects. Responses of subjects to experimentally induced thermal stimuli were measured with the following pain intensity rating scales: vertical visual analog scale (VAS), 21-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS), I I-point Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNS), and Faces Pain Scale (FPS). Results: All 5 pain scales were effective in discriminating different levels of pain sensation; however the VDS was most sensitive and reliable. Failure rates for pain scale completion were minimal, except for the VAS. Although age did not impact failure to properly use this pain intensity rating scale, but rather those conditions more commonly associated with advanced age, including cognitive and psychemotor impairment did. The scale most preferred to represent pain intensity in both cohorts of subjects was the NRS, followed by the VDS, Scale preference was not related to cognitive status, educational level, age, race, or sex. Conclusion: Although all 5 of the pain intensity rating scales were psychometrically sound when used with either age group, failures, internal consistency reliability, construct validity, scale sensitivity, and preference suggest that the VDS is the scale of choice for assessing pain intensity among older adults, including those with mild to moderate cognitive impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 219
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]
*AGS PAN PERS PAIN, 2002, J AM GERIATR SOC, V50, P1
[2]
[Anonymous], PAIN MEASUREMENT ASS
[3]
RESPONSE OF UNMYELINATED (C) POLYMODAL NOCICEPTORS TO THERMAL STIMULI APPLIED TO MONKEYS FACE [J].
BEITEL, RE ;
DUBNER, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 39 (06) :1160-1175
[4]
Benesh L R, 1997, Home Healthc Nurse, V15, P207, DOI 10.1097/00004045-199703000-00009
[5]
Assessing pain and pain relief in geriatric patients with non-pathological fractures with different rating scales [J].
Bergh, I ;
Sjöström, B ;
Odén, A ;
Steen, B .
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 13 (05) :355-361
[6]
Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer [J].
Bernabei, R ;
Gambassi, G ;
Lapane, K ;
Landi, F ;
Gatsonis, C ;
Dunlop, R ;
Lipsitz, L ;
Steel, K ;
Mor, V .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (23) :1877-1882
[7]
THE FACES PAIN SCALE FOR THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE SEVERITY OF PAIN EXPERIENCED BY CHILDREN - DEVELOPMENT, INITIAL VALIDATION, AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION FOR RATIO SCALE PROPERTIES [J].
BIERI, D ;
REEVE, RA ;
CHAMPION, GD ;
ADDICOAT, L ;
ZIEGLER, JB .
PAIN, 1990, 41 (02) :139-150
[8]
Carr ECJ, 1997, J ADV NURS, V26, P1073
[9]
Pain assessment in cognitively impaired and unimpaired older adults: a comparison of four scales [J].
Chibnall, JT ;
Tait, RC .
PAIN, 2001, 92 (1-2) :173-186
[10]
PAIN AND ITS TREATMENT IN OUTPATIENTS WITH METASTATIC CANCER [J].
CLEELAND, CS ;
GONIN, R ;
HATFIELD, AK ;
EDMONSON, JH ;
BLUM, RH ;
STEWART, JA ;
PANDYA, KJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (09) :592-596